search for: amdgpucommontablegen

Hi Praveen, Thanks for the tip, but Xcode seems to spend all the time running tablegen "custom shell scripts", one by one at a time, not linking. Linking is actually very fast, possibly less than a second. The “scripts” that take longer are “AArch64CommonTableGen" and “AMDGPUCommonTableGen”. As said this is on LLVM 9.0. However, on LLVM 7.0.1, the same process takes just 5-6 seconds in total, with individual “scripts” taking significantly less than 1 second each. There must be some difference between LLVM 9.0 and LLVM 7.0 that might cause this (?) John > On 30 Jun 2019, at 1...

...tip, but Xcode seems to spend all the time running > > tablegen "custom shell scripts", one by one at a time, not linking. > > Linking is actually very fast, possibly less than a second. The > > “scripts” that take longer are “AArch64CommonTableGen" and > > “AMDGPUCommonTableGen”. As said this is on LLVM 9.0. > > > > However, on LLVM 7.0.1, the same process takes just 5-6 seconds in > > total, with individual “scripts” taking significantly less than 1 second > > each. There must be some difference between LLVM 9.0 and LLVM 7.0 that > > might...

...he time running >>> > tablegen "custom shell scripts", one by one at a time, not linking. >>> > Linking is actually very fast, possibly less than a second. The >>> > “scripts” that take longer are “AArch64CommonTableGen" and >>> > “AMDGPUCommonTableGen”. As said this is on LLVM 9.0. >>> > >>> > However, on LLVM 7.0.1, the same process takes just 5-6 seconds in >>> > total, with individual “scripts” taking significantly less than 1 second >>> > each. There must be some difference between LLVM 9.0...

...tip, but Xcode seems to spend all the time running > > tablegen "custom shell scripts", one by one at a time, not linking. > > Linking is actually very fast, possibly less than a second. The > > “scripts” that take longer are “AArch64CommonTableGen" and > > “AMDGPUCommonTableGen”. As said this is on LLVM 9.0. > > > > However, on LLVM 7.0.1, the same process takes just 5-6 seconds in > > total, with individual “scripts” taking significantly less than 1 second > > each. There must be some difference between LLVM 9.0 and LLVM 7.0 that > > might...

...time, not linking. >> > Linking is actually very fast, possibly less than a >> second. The >> > “scripts” that take longer are >>  “AArch64CommonTableGen" and >> > “AMDGPUCommonTableGen”. As said this is on LLVM 9.0. >> > >> > However, on LLVM 7.0.1, the same process takes just >> 5-6 seconds in >> > total, with individual “scripts” taking >> significantly less th...

Hi Praveen, Please, can you elaborate on this?. What do do mean by “building as shared objects”. Thanks, John > On 30 Jun 2019, at 07:32, Praveen Velliengiri <praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe try building llvm as a shared objects.. > > On Jun 30, 2019 1:30 AM, "Joan Lluch via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

...linking. >>> > Linking is actually very fast, possibly less than a >>> second. The >>> > “scripts” that take longer are >>>  “AArch64CommonTableGen" and >>> > “AMDGPUCommonTableGen”. As said this is on LLVM 9.0. >>> > >>> > However, on LLVM 7.0.1, the same process takes just >>> 5-6 seconds in >>> > total, with individual “scripts” taking >>> s...