search for: ambl

...hich makes me twitchy and nervous. So I''d to like to make it step down like a good little process to a much less privileged user. I can''t do this in the /etc/init.d/ script, as it then can''t write the pid file (and probably other things). But putting it in the setup post amble doesn''t seem to work (the wiki is still root) So where should my Process.uid statements go? Regards, Jon.

Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I don't know if what I am trying to do should work or not. I have 2 disk images. One is a VM with an ext2 boot filesystem and ext4 filesystems with the OS loaded. I am amble to guestmount this with no issue and am able to see the files that are on the ext2 file system. I can also run guestfish on the image, mount the ext2 filesystem, and list the files. However, the second image I have is only a boot disk image with just an ext2 filesystem. guestmount complains tha...

..., Leonard Basuino wrote: > > Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I don't know if what I > > am trying to do should work or not. > > > > I have 2 disk images. One is a VM with an ext2 boot filesystem and ext4 > > filesystems with the OS loaded. I am amble to guestmount this with no > > issue and am able to see the files that are on the ext2 file system. > > > > I can also run guestfish on the image, mount the ext2 filesystem, and > list > > the files. > > > > However, the second image I have is only a boot dis...

...d. Or is it: a twisty maze of little passages : N a little maze of twisty passages : N (etc) but I keep missing my batteries! <and my lantern is going dim...> [sorry for the OLD reference!] Was: Help-w2k pro no longer "trusted" in 2.2.3 pdc ------------------Here is the pre-amble and request?!---------------- Here's my story...sad but true. I've got a run-away PDC, that makes me blue. It don't see my NT-clients nice anymore, now it says, "get offa my Floor" And I'm in the doghouse so I'm writing you so that I don't kicked o...

...2015 at 06:00:06PM -0500, Leonard Basuino wrote: > Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I don't know if what I > am trying to do should work or not. > > I have 2 disk images. One is a VM with an ext2 boot filesystem and ext4 > filesystems with the OS loaded. I am amble to guestmount this with no > issue and am able to see the files that are on the ext2 file system. > > I can also run guestfish on the image, mount the ext2 filesystem, and list > the files. > > However, the second image I have is only a boot disk image with just an > ext2 fi...

...> > > Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I don't know if what I > > > am trying to do should work or not. > > > > > > I have 2 disk images. One is a VM with an ext2 boot filesystem and ext4 > > > filesystems with the OS loaded. I am amble to guestmount this with no > > > issue and am able to see the files that are on the ext2 file system. > > > > > > I can also run guestfish on the image, mount the ext2 filesystem, and > > list > > > the files. > > > > > > However, the sec...

...39;'ve taken the Camping Short Short Example and uploaded it, along with a dispatch.fcgi and an .htaccess file. My question is - given the state of Camping development right now, what should each of these look like? I''ve tried multiple solutions offered on the mailing lists, from Post-ambles to Campingrcs, and no combination seems to work. What I have so far: * The original Short Short Camping example, with the class HomePage changed to Beta. * This .htaccess: AddHandler fastcgi-script .fcgi Options +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/stats/(...

...roots.metadata = f_metadata; > roots.roots[0] = NULL; > roots.roots[1] = NULL; > roots.roots[2] = NULL; What are the three roots here? Not sure where anything but the next, metadata are coming from. So the gc "shadow-stack" generates that preamble code? That would make sense > shadowStackHead = (ShadowStackEntry *) &roots; > > ... user code ... here is where my gcroots go then I guess. > shadowStackHead = entry.next; // before any exit > return; > } Can you tell me where to find...

...ontconfig directly or indirectly RUN_DEPENDS on gnomecontrolcenter which in turn depends back to XFree86-4-libraries. All cycles include XFree86-4-libraries -> fontconfig -> gtkhtml -> gnomecore -> gnomecontrolcenter sequence at the top (or tail) of the sequences. Note this pre(post)amble itself contains shortcuts that bypass gtkhtml, gnomecore, or both. gconf -> gtk12 -> gconf -> oaf -> gnomehier -> gconf -> oaf -> gtk12 -> gdk-pixbuf -> gtk12 -> gnomecanvas -> gdk-pixbuf -> gtk12 -> gnomecanvas -> gnomelibs -> scrollkeeper ->...

On 2008-04-20, at 21:05, Terence Parr wrote: > On Apr 20, 2008, at 5:36 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> Since the semispace heap doesn't actually work (it's an example, at >> best), I suggest you simply copy the stack visitor into your >> project; it's only a dozen lines of code or so. > > > Ok, copying; can't find ShadowStackEntry though.

On Apr 20, 2008, at 5:36 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > The shadow stack walker is in the runtime directory with the semispace > heap example. The runtime directory is built to LLVM IR using llvm- > gcc. So it's skipped unless you configure llvm with llvm-gcc support. doh! That's how I missed the binary. thanks! > Since the semispace heap doesn't actually work (it's

Hi, I''ve been playing around with using DBI instead of ActiveRecord ''cause I just love to beat myself up! ;) Is this an okay way to do this, or is there any other more creative ways? require ''dbi'' module MyApp:Models class DB def self.dbh DBI.connect(''DBI:Mysql:dbname'', ''username'',

...adata; >> roots.roots[0] = NULL; >> roots.roots[1] = NULL; >> roots.roots[2] = NULL; > > What are the three roots here? Not sure where anything but the next, > metadata are coming from. So the gc "shadow-stack" generates that > preamble code? That would make sense These would correspond to three gcroot allocas. >> shadowStackHead = (ShadowStackEntry *) &roots; >> >> ... user code ... > > here is where my gcroots go then I guess. This is where your uses of them would occur. llvm.gcroo...

Fix for pygrub path on Solaris. Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com> diff --git a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ from xen.util.blkif import blkdev_uname_ from xen.util.blkif import blkdev_uname_to_file from xen.util

...file =================================================================== --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +/* + Asm versions of Xen pv-ops, suitable for either direct use or inlining. + The inline versions are the same as the direct-use versions, with the + pre- and post-amble chopped off. + + This code is encoded for size rather than absolute efficiency, + with a view to being able to inline as much as possible. + + We only bother with direct forms (ie, vcpu in percpu data) of + the operations here; the indirect forms are better handled in + C, since they''re g...

Hi Andi, This series of patches implements the Xen paravirt-ops interface. It applies to 2.6.21-git13 + patches-2.6.21-git7-070507-1.tar.gz (I think "unwinder" is the only patch which doesn't apply to git13, and the sched-clock patches are the only ones which this series actually needs). Changes since the last posting: - More netfront review and cleanup - Added ability to

Hi Andi, This series of patches implements the Xen paravirt-ops interface. It applies to 2.6.21-git13 + patches-2.6.21-git7-070507-1.tar.gz (I think "unwinder" is the only patch which doesn't apply to git13, and the sched-clock patches are the only ones which this series actually needs). Changes since the last posting: - More netfront review and cleanup - Added ability to

Hi Andi, This series of patches implements the Xen paravirt-ops interface. It applies to 2.6.21-git13 + patches-2.6.21-git7-070507-1.tar.gz (I think "unwinder" is the only patch which doesn't apply to git13, and the sched-clock patches are the only ones which this series actually needs). Changes since the last posting: - More netfront review and cleanup - Added ability to

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners