search for: amalgamate

Dear List, If any of observed and/or expected data has less than 5 frequencies, then chisq.test (Pearson's Chi-squared Test for Count Data from package:stats) gives warning messages. For example, x<-c(10, 14, 10, 11, 11, 7, 8, 4, 1, 4, 4, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1) y<-c(9.13112391745095, 13.1626482033341, 12.6623267638188, 11.0130706413029, 9.16415925139016,

Dear all, I need to process large amounts of data (two or three variables for 6,000 cases) cluster analysis. In the end I need to fill the source data to the obtained clusters. I need to trace the sequence of data fusion. In this case, I can fill in a cluster (with any level of linkage distance) by data. This procedure is implemented in the package Statistica, but this package can not work with

Hi, I am trying to get an IP adress, nfs root host and directory information for a xen vm on the kernel level at boot time from dhcp. When the dhcp requests from the xen VM arrive on my server, my dhcp server denies to give them an IP address, it''s syslog reads: May 4 05:13:21 amalgam dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 255.255.255.255 (1.2.3.4) from 00:16:3e:00:00:11 via eth0: ignored (not

...early stage pass running at the very beginning of the > pipeline in `-O{1,2,3}'. Greg Bedwell's report from his DExTer tool > shows SROA on function as one of the major culprits of Debug Info > loss. > > With debugify-each partially done I tried testing this on the > amalgamated sqlite source. > > The steps are as follows: > ,---- > | # generate IR file without debug info and optnone > | clang -O0 -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone -S -emit-llvm sqlite3.c -o sqlite > | > | # run opt > | opt -sroa -debugify-each sqlite -disable-output 2> result...

> That is good to hear / expected, since we went though great lengths to ensure that SROA preserves variable debug info. > > Have you looked at the location-less phi instructions? > Does empty mean line 0 or do you mean they have no debug location whatsoever? Most of them have line 0, only 12 are locationless. > Are they empty for good reasons or does it look more like an

At present R has separate functions "spline" and "splinefun". The first of these carries out spline interpolation of a data set and returns the interpolated values; the second returns the interpolating function itself (approx and approxfun are similar). I would like to combine these into a single function "spline" with an (optional) argument which determines which

FWIW, I've raised the LICM issue here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37682 On 31 May 2018 at 13:28, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, > These are very helpful. > > As I understand it, SROA and LICM render some variables > "useless" by optimizing the code to not use them. Hence we can't debug > them. > >

> > is in the business of deciding, but it does score it as a difference > because it now, at no point, sees the expression "first" evaluate to a > value of 5, or "total" to a value of 8 which it did previously. From the > source-level debugging experience, the variables now just get updated > between iterations. > Obviously should've been 7 for that

...a package if DESCRIPTION's Maintainer field does not have a valid email adress or the special value "ORPHANED". (The check is done with tools:::.valid_maintainer_field_regexp.) I imagine a typical Maintainer line for the package "foo" might be something like Maintainer: Amalgamated Widget's Support Team <http://support.amalgamatedwidgets.com/spackage?name=foo> How much does the package system (or CRAN) depend on the Maintainer field being an email address? I can imagine programs would find mailing to an address easier than dealing with a website, but humans would...

Hello all, I've scoured the archives and google and I can't figure out how to amalgamate a set of vectors of differing lengths in such a way as I can calculate the mean easily. The following dummy example contains vectors of length 1, but my data has vectors of various lengths. R> test = list(); for(i in 1:5) {test = append(test, i)} R> test [[1]] [1] 1 [[2]] [1] 2 [[3]] [1]...

...==== `SROA' is an early stage pass running at the very beginning of the pipeline in `-O{1,2,3}'. Greg Bedwell's report from his DExTer tool shows SROA on function as one of the major culprits of Debug Info loss. With debugify-each partially done I tried testing this on the amalgamated sqlite source. The steps are as follows: ,---- | # generate IR file without debug info and optnone | clang -O0 -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone -S -emit-llvm sqlite3.c -o sqlite | | # run opt | opt -sroa -debugify-each sqlite -disable-output 2> results `---- Results ======= [H...

> > > `SROA' is an early stage pass running at the very beginning of the > pipeline in `-O{1,2,3}'. Greg Bedwell's report from his DExTer tool > shows SROA on function as one of the major culprits of Debug Info > loss. > > The methodology I used is with the opt-bisect-limit option on clang, so it's not strictly the case that the results presented

...river. My question is: will this be properly supported in any upcoming release? By properly, I mean will it at least get a tidier name and perhaps support for missing features like the input and output voltage monitoring (if it actually supports it, of course.) Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Amalgamated Durables, Inc. - "We don't make the things you buy." Email: rjwalsh@durables.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : htt...

Hi Everyone, Since Satellite 6 is an amalgam of other F/OSS projects and is no longer solely based on Spacewalk, is a new upstream project for Satellite 6 going to be created? BEtter yet, is a new upstream project already available? Ranbir -- Kanwar R.S. Sandhu

I'm in the process of setting up subversion and since the version packages with C5 is, shall we say, showing its age, I've built an updated version. In order to do that I had to upgrade sqlite from the default 3.3.6 (which the current subversion will not build with) and I went with 3.6.22. Has anyone else had any experience with whether or not that breaks anything? I'm a little

...cept) 1 48 697.7770 <.0001 Xvar1 1 2 127.1378 0.0078 Xvar2 12 48 330.5172 <.0001 Block 2 2 22.7960 0.0420 Xvar1:Xvar2 12 48 282.0917 <.0001 OK, all variables are significative, now I try to make the model simplification, I try to amalgamate levels of Xvar2. Looking the mean: > tapply(Yvar,list(Xvar2,Xvar1),mean) A B a 1.6666667 1.6666667 ... h 0.3333333 0.6666667 ... j 0.3333333 0.6666667 ... m 11.0000000 5.6666667 Look that the mean of h and j are exactly the same in A and B, therefore h and j maybe a...

> > To get around this i updated CVS HEAD and changed the sip entity from > > type=user to type=peer (yes peer!) (type=friend works too but im making > > a point) the client now must register to set his outbound caller*ID > Number. > > Yes, that is normal. SIP has difficulty separating the remote party > identification from the authentication identification

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:51 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > Also, it isn't up to the *installer* to set up a system that resists > brute-force password attacks. Give us the tools to do the job ! My amalgamated idea is:- (1) When external access gets a password wrong 'n' occasions, as determined by the SysAdmin, the external IP address is automatically permanently blocked unless that IP is included in a IP Tables 'allow' table. (2) If specifically allowed in IP Tables, that IP be block...

Hello, I'm trying to compile sqlite3 using llvm-gcc, then run it with lli. I've attached a Makefile and a main.c that simply invokes sqlite3_initialize(). You'll need to download sqlite3 (it was too big to attach) and copy main.c and the Makefile into the directory where sqlite3.c is [Link: sqlite-amalgamation-3_7_0_1.zip <http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-amalgamation-3_7_0_1.zip>

...lot about the Linux side, but Windows is a bit of a mystery to me... and I have to confess to not knowing exactly how nss links various directory services into the system.... hence my comment earlier with "Password file entry" in quotes... I know it's not in the password file, and is amalgamated into the password "map", via nss, but I'm not sure what the correct terminology is for that.... "map" makes me think NIS, but I guess it could be extended to other directory services now. One thing I would ask, especially given your earlier assistance with my configs... co...