search for: alvarocastro

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "alvarocastro".

2009 Mar 09
1
[LLVMdev] addPassesToEmitFile
...first version was working perfectly. > > > I would really appreciate if someone could give me a clue of what I'm > > doing wrong... > > > Thank you, > > > Bests, > > -- > |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > > >http://www.alvarocastro.es > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVM... at cs.uiuc.edu        http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2009 Mar 08
0
[LLVMdev] addPassesToEmitFile
...;t track it with gdb. The first version was working perfectly. > > > I would really appreciate if someone could give me a clue of what I'm > doing wrong... > > Thank you, > > > Bests, > -- |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > http://www.alvarocastro.es
2009 Mar 08
2
[LLVMdev] addPassesToEmitFile
Hi, Long time ago (llvm-svn june 2008) I asked here about a way to output the assembly code of my JIT generated code to a string, so I could use it to read it on the screen. I came up with this solution: std::string Err; const llvm::TargetMachineRegistry::entry* _arch = llvm::TargetMachineRegistry::getClosestTargetForJIT(Err); std::string FeaturesStr; llvm::TargetMachine*
2009 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] Printing x86 ASM for Function
Dear Maxime, Nyx wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know how to go about printing the x86 assembly output for a > compiled function (I'm using the JIT). I saw there is a X86IntelAsmPrinter > on doxygen. However, it takes several arguments I don't know how to fill in. > Is there a helper function to create such a pass? Once I have the pass > created, do I just add it
2008 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] Erlang
Hello, How would you implement an Erlang feature such as the ultra-light processes? Is llvm prepared for similar situations? I would appreciate some insight on this. Thank you very much, .alvaro.castro.castilla.
2008 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] Erlang
Hi Álvaro, Your question is too vague to answer with any accuracy. Could you be more specific? -bw On Jul 24, 2008, at 1:08 PM, "Álvaro Castro Castilla" <alvaro.castro.castilla at gmail.co m> wrote: > Hello, > > > How would you implement an Erlang feature such as the ultra-light > processes? > Is llvm prepared for similar situations? > > I would
2008 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] Erlang
...> - Simon > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > http://www.alvarocastro.es
2009 Mar 16
2
[LLVMdev] Printing x86 ASM for Function
Hello, I would like to know how to go about printing the x86 assembly output for a compiled function (I'm using the JIT). I saw there is a X86IntelAsmPrinter on doxygen. However, it takes several arguments I don't know how to fill in. Is there a helper function to create such a pass? Once I have the pass created, do I just add it to a FunctionPassManager? Thank you for your time, -
2008 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] Erlang
...llvmdev > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > http://www.alvarocastro.es
2008 Jul 25
4
[LLVMdev] Erlang
2008/7/24 Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com>: >> * They are isolated and the only way to exchange information is >> message passing >> > This one is hard to guarantee in a compiled context, unless you > implement a lot of stuff to track pointer values. Remember, all of > these threads will be sharing an address space. If you want true > protection, you'll
2008 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Hi Kenneth, If the LLVM project is switching to CMake, then CTest might be the framework of choice to use rather than scripting up something in Bash. --Sam --- On Wed, 7/30/08, Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> wrote: > From: Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system? > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing