search for: alues

Hi, I have a list of mutations, called "mutList", of the form: > head(mutList) Alu 1 AluJ 2 AluJ/F(R)AM 3 AluJ/FLAM 4 AluJ/FRAM 5 AluJ/monomer 6 AluJb It contains about 500 elements and not all of them contain the sequence "Alu". I tried using this code: Alu<-mutList[which(grep("Alu",mutList)==1)] But that simply returned

Hello, I have one question about the ALU scheduler. If for example I have one UNIFY volume which is using ALU scheduler with the following config: volume unify type cluster/unify option namespace afr-ns option scheduler rr option scheduler alu # use the ALU scheduler option alu.limits.min-free-disk 3% # Don't create files one a volume with less than 5% free diskspace

In BPF, an ADD instruction is defined as a 2 register instruction: 0x0f. add dst, src. dst += src In BPFInstrInfo.td this kind of ALU instruction is defined with: def _rr : ALU_RR<BPF_ALU64, Opc, (outs GPR:$dst), (ins GPR:$src2, GPR:$src), "$dst "#OpcodeStr#" $src", [(set

== Data Copying when a new brick is added. == Hi. I'm a first time glusterfs user, and I'm trying to simulate what will happen when I need to add more bricks for storage capacity. My config files are below but I'll try and explain what is going on. I have 2 machines with 2 hard drives in each. I created a replicated storage system where machine a replicates to machine b.

I've been experimenting with llvm/clang as a user for a while now, but now I'm interested in writing my own backend. I'm also developing the target architecture (maybe to go in an fpga eventually) and I'm intentionally making it extremely simple. I think of it as a narrow microcode, because (for example) performing an add requires a sequence of instructions like: set aluin1 = r1

5-nodes server and 1 node client are connected by gigabits Ethernet. #] iozone -r 32k -r 512k -s 8G KB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 8388608 32 10559 9792 62435 62260 8388608 512 63012 63409 63409 63138 It seems 32k write/rewrite performance are very

elbert at host1:~$ dpkg -l|grep glusterfs ii glusterfs-client 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse client ii glusterfs-server 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse server ii libglusterfs0 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS libraries and translator modules I have 2 hosts set up to use AFR with

On 25 March 2016 at 04:11, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > As I understand it, the fundamental property being addresses here is: Are the semantics of scalar FP math the same as vector FP math? TTI seems like a good place to expose that information. If the semantics are indeed different, then the vectorizer would require fast-math flags in order to vectorize FP operations

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > Compiles aren't a great benchmark for a box since its 100% cpu and > neglects memory or disk performance but I had the numbers handy > for that :-) BTW, it is 100% ALU and a major strain on the ALU LOAD. In other words, it's not a good benchmark for even CPU. That's why the 3-issue ALU in the Nx586 on-ward blows the

This fixes a somewhat indeterministic corruption problem on nv17 when there is stuff going on the other fifos (e.g. gallium but I've also reproduced it with an app just SIFM-ing memory around): in some cases it made the blits the X server had scheduled use the wrong pitch. Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> --- src/nv04_exa.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- 1

Dear group, Here is my data.frame : df <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = c("PRM HGH GD ALU", "PRM HGH GD ALU", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ",

Hi Andrea, So does this definition make sense for basic blocks with more than one instructions? E.g. how should one interpret a basic block with RThroughput of 2.3? On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:39 AM Andrea Di Biagio <andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Field 'Total Cycles' from the summary view simply reports the elapsed > number of cycles for the entire

On Apr 8, 2011, at 9:56 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: >>> 8B C3 mov eax, ebx >>> 03 C1 add eax, ecx >>> becomes >>> 8B C3 03 C1 add eax, ebx, ecx > > In my understanding, twoaddr pass tends to emit such a sequence. Yes, it always does, and the coalescer tries very hard to eliminate the copy. > Though I

Jonas, At this point, the DFA packetizer models a simple VLIW architecture and does not accommodate multiple stages. That's the reason for the behavior you're seeing. -Anshu --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation *From:*llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jonas

Hi Andy and all, I have a question about per-operand machine model. I am finding some relations between 'MCWriteLatencyEntry' and 'MCWriteProcResEntry'. For example, class InstTEST<..., InstrItinClass itin> : Instruction { let Itinerary = Itin; } // I assume this MI writes 2 registers. def TESTINST : InstTEST<..., II_TEST> // schedule info II_TEST:

...te that floating-point operations are **not** generated by GCC's auto-vectorization pass **unless** -funsafe-math-optimizations is also specified. This is because NEON hardware does not fully implement the IEEE 754 standard for floating-point arithmetic (in particular denormal values are treated as zero), so the use of NEON instructions may lead to a loss of precision. That is to say, GCC will only auto-vectorize floationg-point arithmetic if both -mfpu=neon AND -funsafe-math-optimizations are given. -mfpu=neon by itself does not imply that it is OK for GCC to generate...

From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> after this change nouveau passes all fill and blend tests of rendercheck (before: fill - 108/120, blend - 3323868/3569150) tested on NV34 Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- src/nv04_exa.c | 19 +++++++++---------- src/nv_accel_common.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0100, Jiong Wang via iovisor-dev wrote: > On 18/09/2017 22:29, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > On 09/18/2017 10:47 PM, Jiong Wang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > >    Currently, LLVM eBPF backend always generate code in 64-bit mode, > > > this may > > > cause troubles when JITing to 32-bit targets. > > >

Pre-nv50 has all sorts of funny requirements for non-copy alu operations, and will bail out of solid fills left and right. Account for that case and fall back to the memset. Reported-by: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/drmmode_display.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Hi all, I am trying to implement an instruction with no operand for example "clr" in TableGen. ----------------------------------------- e.g. *InstrInfo.td:* class TestInst<string opc, string asmstr, dag oops, dag iops, list<dag> pattern> : Instruction { ... } def int_no_operand : Intrinsic<[]>; class ALU<string opc> : TestInst<opc,