Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "alpha_noop_mapping_error".
2015 Oct 30
0
[PATCH 2/3] alpha: use common noop dma ops
...ction dir, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
-{
- int i;
- struct scatterlist *sg;
-
- for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
- void *va;
-
- BUG_ON(!sg_page(sg));
- va = sg_virt(sg);
- sg_dma_address(sg) = (dma_addr_t)virt_to_phys(va);
- sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
- }
-
- return nents;
-}
-
-static int alpha_noop_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static int alpha_noop_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
{
return mask < 0x00ffffffUL ? 0 : 1;
@@ -168,10 +130,10 @@ static int alpha_noop_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
struct dma_map_ops alpha_noop_ops = {
.all...
2015 Nov 05
0
[GIT PULL v4 2/3] alpha/dma: use common noop dma ops
...ction dir, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
-{
- int i;
- struct scatterlist *sg;
-
- for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
- void *va;
-
- BUG_ON(!sg_page(sg));
- va = sg_virt(sg);
- sg_dma_address(sg) = (dma_addr_t)virt_to_phys(va);
- sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
- }
-
- return nents;
-}
-
-static int alpha_noop_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static int alpha_noop_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
{
return mask < 0x00ffffffUL ? 0 : 1;
@@ -168,10 +130,10 @@ static int alpha_noop_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
struct dma_map_ops alpha_noop_ops = {
.all...
2015 Nov 05
5
[GIT PULL v4 0/3] dma and virtio prep patches
Andy,
to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch
The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861:
Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma
for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee:
s390/dma: Allow
2015 Nov 05
5
[GIT PULL v4 0/3] dma and virtio prep patches
Andy,
to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch
The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861:
Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma
for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee:
s390/dma: Allow
2015 Nov 03
5
[PATCHv3 0/3] dma ops and virtio
Andy,
this is the next and hopefully last version. Seems to work fine
when replacing the previous patches in your tree. I have some
reviews/acks for patch 2 and 3. patch 1 still needs one ack.
Can you replace the patches in your tree and carry them along
with your changes?
old introduction:
-----
There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well
as some attempts to make virtio use
2015 Nov 03
5
[PATCHv3 0/3] dma ops and virtio
Andy,
this is the next and hopefully last version. Seems to work fine
when replacing the previous patches in your tree. I have some
reviews/acks for patch 2 and 3. patch 1 still needs one ack.
Can you replace the patches in your tree and carry them along
with your changes?
old introduction:
-----
There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well
as some attempts to make virtio use
2015 Oct 30
8
[PATCHv2 0/3] dma ops and virtio
here is the 2nd version of providing an DMA API for s390.
There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well
as some attempts to make virtio use the dma API (Andy).
At kernel summit we concluded that we want to use the same code on all
platforms, whereever possible, so having a dummy dma_op might be the
easiest solution to keep virtio-ccw as similar as possible to
2015 Oct 30
8
[PATCHv2 0/3] dma ops and virtio
here is the 2nd version of providing an DMA API for s390.
There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well
as some attempts to make virtio use the dma API (Andy).
At kernel summit we concluded that we want to use the same code on all
platforms, whereever possible, so having a dummy dma_op might be the
easiest solution to keep virtio-ccw as similar as possible to
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too