search for: alonc

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "alonc".

Did you mean: along
2017 Mar 07
1
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
...with a warning .. ) > > > Perhaps we could "flip the switch" in a test > > environment and see how much havoc is wreaked and whether > > authors are sufficiently responsive? > > > Michael > > As we have > 10'000 packages on CRAN alonce, and people have > started (mis)using suppressWarnings(.) in many places, there > may be considerably more packages affected than we optimistically assume... > > As R core member who would "flip the switch" I'd typically then > have to be the one sending an e-mail...
2017 Mar 06
0
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
...'if(x[1])' for them albeit with a warning .. ) > Perhaps we could "flip the switch" in a test > environment and see how much havoc is wreaked and whether > authors are sufficiently responsive? > Michael As we have > 10'000 packages on CRAN alonce, and people have started (mis)using suppressWarnings(.) in many places, there may be considerably more packages affected than we optimistically assume... As R core member who would "flip the switch" I'd typically then have to be the one sending an e-mail to all package maintaine...
2017 Mar 04
3
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
Is there really a need for these complications? Packages emitting this warning are broken by definition and should be fixed. Perhaps we could "flip the switch" in a test environment and see how much havoc is wreaked and whether authors are sufficiently responsive? Michael On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch > wrote: >