Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "alonc".
Did you mean:
along
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
2017 Mar 07
1
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
...with a warning .. )
>
> > Perhaps we could "flip the switch" in a test
> > environment and see how much havoc is wreaked and whether
> > authors are sufficiently responsive?
>
> > Michael
>
> As we have > 10'000 packages on CRAN alonce, and people have
> started (mis)using suppressWarnings(.) in many places, there
> may be considerably more packages affected than we optimistically assume...
>
> As R core member who would "flip the switch" I'd typically then
> have to be the one sending an e-mail...
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
2017 Mar 06
0
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
...'if(x[1])' for them albeit
with a warning .. )
> Perhaps we could "flip the switch" in a test
> environment and see how much havoc is wreaked and whether
> authors are sufficiently responsive?
> Michael
As we have > 10'000 packages on CRAN alonce, and people have
started (mis)using suppressWarnings(.) in many places, there
may be considerably more packages affected than we optimistically assume...
As R core member who would "flip the switch" I'd typically then
have to be the one sending an e-mail to all package maintaine...
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
2017 Mar 04
3
Control statements with condition with greater than one should give error (not just warning) [PATCH]
Is there really a need for these complications? Packages emitting this
warning are broken by definition and should be fixed. Perhaps we could
"flip the switch" in a test environment and see how much havoc is wreaked
and whether authors are sufficiently responsive?
Michael
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch
> wrote:
>