search for: aload

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "aload".

Did you mean: load
2008 Jun 11
3
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Hi all, I'm trying to figure out a weird bug I'm seeing. I'm hoping it's something simple in my IR but I can't see anything wrong so I'm hoping someone here can see something. I'm using LLVM to compile Java bytecode into native functions. My code keeps track of the Java local variables in an array of llvm::Value pointers which get phi'd up at various points. The
2016 May 31
0
va_arg on Windows 64 bits
...i64   %a = alloca i64   %b = alloca i64   %t = alloca i64   %rPty = alloca i64*   %aPty = alloca i64*   %bPty = alloca i64*   %tPty = alloca i64*   store i64* %r, i64** %rPty   store i64* %a, i64** %aPty   store i64* %b, i64** %bPty   store i64* %t, i64** %tPty   %rLoad = load i64*, i64** %rPty   %aLoad = load i64*, i64** %aPty   %bLoad = load i64*, i64** %bPty   %tLoad = load i64*, i64** %tPty   %ret = alloca i64   %retPty = alloca i64*   store i64* %ret, i64** %retPty   %load = load i64*, i64** %retPty   %bit = bitcast i64* %load to i8*   call void (i64, i8*, ...) @variadiquefunc(i64 -6778056391...
2016 Apr 20
3
va_arg on Windows 64
...i64   %a = alloca i64   %b = alloca i64   %t = alloca i64   %rPty = alloca i64*   %aPty = alloca i64*   %bPty = alloca i64*   %tPty = alloca i64*   store i64* %r, i64** %rPty   store i64* %a, i64** %aPty   store i64* %b, i64** %bPty   store i64* %t, i64** %tPty   %rLoad = load i64*, i64** %rPty   %aLoad = load i64*, i64** %aPty   %bLoad = load i64*, i64** %bPty   %tLoad = load i64*, i64** %tPty   %ret = alloca i64   %retPty = alloca i64*   store i64* %ret, i64** %retPty   %load = load i64*, i64** %retPty   %bit = bitcast i64* %load to i8*   call void (i64, i8*, ...) @variadiquefunc(i64 -6778056391...
2008 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable >> (and shows the problem). > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way > I can get compilable IR from that?
2008 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Duncan Sands wrote: > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled > to an executable (and shows the problem). I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way I can get compilable IR from that? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/
2008 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
....bc.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 44689 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080612/58edfb17/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- 630: iload local_4_113 = 0 632: iload local_5_114 = 57 local_4_113 = 0 634: if_icmplt 132: aload_3 133: iload 135: caload 136: istore 138: iload 140: sipush 143: if_icmpge 146: iload 148: iload 150: if_icmplt 185: aload 187: iload 189: iinc 192: iload 194: i2b 195: bastore 196: iinc 199: goto 630: iload local_4_419 = 1 632: iload local_5_420 = 261095424 local_4_419 = 1 -------------- next part...