search for: allroot

...ions/JM/lencod/lencod cbe /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod ^^ no idea jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi ^^ no idea cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie ^^ cbe doesn't support inline asm (bzero lowering) jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots ^^ no idea llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vect...

I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch. To check out the release branch: cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r

...e/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/simul/simul | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo...

...0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc 0.0005 0.0005 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football 0.0005 0.0005 0....

...* 0.70 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep | 0.7183 138476 0.7390 * 0.2720 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.30 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots | 0.0229 4636 0.0248 * 0.0240 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler | 0.2920 82104 0.4514 * 0.3182...

...* 0.67 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep | 0.7720 133056 0.9720 * 0.3520 | 0.02 0.01 0.00 * 0.40 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots | 0.0280 4372 0.0360 * 0.0280 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie | 0.2920 66052 0.3520 * 0.0640...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...* 0.44 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep | * * * * * | 0.02 * * * * | n/a n/a n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots | 0.0216 4364 0.0229 * 0.0265 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler | 0.2554 84032 0.4348 * 0.3179...

...* 0.48 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep | 0.2852 147816 0.3477 * 0.1382 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.16 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots | 0.0098 4808 0.0128 * 0.0129 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler | 0.1156 83448 0.2455 * 0.2083...

...63 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep                            | > 0.3700 92964    0.5300      *                0.1999      |    0.02    0.01 >  0.01 *           0.23 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots                      | > 0.0200 3556     0.0200      *                0.0200      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.04 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie                   | > 0.2000 47648    0.2199      *        ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...- n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/ > agrep | 0.3700 92964 0.5300 > * 0.1999 | 0.02 0.01 0.01 * > 0.23 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/ > allroots | 0.0200 3556 0.0200 > * 0.0200 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.04 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/ > archie | 0.2000 47648 0.2199...

....1355 1.1488 0.0028 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMcCat%2F01-qbsort%2Fqbsort.compile=on> > 1.16% 0.1118 0.1131 0.0003 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FProlangs-C%2Fallroots%2Fallroots.compile=on> > 1.14% 0.0965 0.0976 0.0003 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/si...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

...e configuration designed for benchmarking exclude the following: MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg MultiSource/Applications/treecc/treecc MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prola...

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make