search for: allowoptions_flag_v

Apologies for how that formatted. Also on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/EXSq75yX --Ian > From: ian at internals.io > To: ady-sf at hotmail.com; syslinux at zytor.com > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:09:09 -0500 > Subject: Re: [syslinux] Issues with syslinux_run_command(str) and parameters > > I don't think that's it, but fair enough, try this sample config: >

...eal, though. Do we consider it intended functionality that modules such as whichsys will not work under ALLOWOPTIONS 0? A strict reading of the wiki would allow for this, as the subsequently loaded module does not have parameters in an append label: http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/SYSLINUX#ALLOWOPTIONS_flag_val Naturally given my situation here, I think it would be ideal if we could separate disabling user edits & commands from blocking modules loading other modules, etc. :) --Ian > From: ady-sf at hotmail.com > To: syslinux at zytor.com > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 03:36:35 +0300 > Subjec...