search for: alloc_s

Hi Samba Users, I forgot to send this mail to the samba ML, too. The question is whether anyone is using the idmap alloc config options for idmap_ldap. I would like to remove them for Samba 3.6. Details below. Thanks - Michael ----- Forwarded message from Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> ----- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:19:56 +0100 From: Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> To:

...E  \          -D'opus_alloc(x)=NULL' -D'opus_free(x)=NULL' Secondly; With the "overide" directives above no dynamic memory allocation is supposed to happen. However, the following call chain (obviously)  cause a crash: opus_encode(..)-> opus_encode_native(..)->ALLOC_STACK->opus_alloc_scratch(..)->opus_alloc(..) Is this a bug or what am I missing here ? Any advise on how to get a basic encode/decode example working would be most appriciated. Thanks ! \Eric

Workqueues have clean and rich API for all basic operations. The code is usually easier and better readable. It can be easily tuned for the given purpose. In many cases, it allows to avoid an extra kernel thread. It helps to stop the growing number of them. Also there will be less thread-specific hacks all over the kernel code. It forces making the task selfcontained. There is no longer an

Workqueues have clean and rich API for all basic operations. The code is usually easier and better readable. It can be easily tuned for the given purpose. In many cases, it allows to avoid an extra kernel thread. It helps to stop the growing number of them. Also there will be less thread-specific hacks all over the kernel code. It forces making the task selfcontained. There is no longer an