Displaying 20 results from an estimated 48 matches for "alloc_bootmem_low_pag".
Did you mean:
alloc_bootmem_low_pages
2013 Jan 24
1
[PATCH 35/35] x86: Don't panic if can not alloc buffer for swiotlb
...1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
index 41dd0088..02f2444 100644
--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
@@ -317,7 +317,8 @@ void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
octeon_swiotlb = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(swiotlbsize);
- swiotlb_init_with_tbl(octeon_swiotlb, swiotlb_nslabs, 1);
+ if (swiotlb_init_with_tbl(octeon_swiotlb, swiotlb_nslabs, 1) == -ENOMEM)
+ panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer");
mips_dma_map_ops = &octeon_linear_dma_map_ops.dma_map_ops;
}
diff --git a/drivers/x...
2013 Jan 24
1
[PATCH 35/35] x86: Don't panic if can not alloc buffer for swiotlb
...1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
index 41dd0088..02f2444 100644
--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
@@ -317,7 +317,8 @@ void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
octeon_swiotlb = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(swiotlbsize);
- swiotlb_init_with_tbl(octeon_swiotlb, swiotlb_nslabs, 1);
+ if (swiotlb_init_with_tbl(octeon_swiotlb, swiotlb_nslabs, 1) == -ENOMEM)
+ panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer");
mips_dma_map_ops = &octeon_linear_dma_map_ops.dma_map_ops;
}
diff --git a/drivers/x...
2005 Oct 04
2
Question regarding behavior of virt_to_bus ....
Hi Folks,
I need some large chunk of physical memory, so I allocate it early using
alloc_bootmem_low_pages and use it later (akin to bigphysarea patch).
The trouble I am having is the following. Suppose the virtual address
for the memory area is 0xc14d6000. After xen_create_contiguous_region
call, I do a virt_to_bus and the bus address comes out to be 0x18000000.
So far so good. However, later whe...
2007 Apr 18
1
Is this a typo?
static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(pgd_t *pgd)
{
pud_t *pud;
pmd_t *pmd_table;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
pmd_table = (pmd_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
paravirt_alloc_pmd(__pa(page_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
^^^^^^^^^^ pmd_table?
set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(__pa(pmd_table) | _PAGE_PRESENT));
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
if (pmd_table != pmd_offset(pud, 0))
BUG();
#else
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
pmd_tabl...
2007 Apr 18
1
Is this a typo?
static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(pgd_t *pgd)
{
pud_t *pud;
pmd_t *pmd_table;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
pmd_table = (pmd_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
paravirt_alloc_pmd(__pa(page_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
^^^^^^^^^^ pmd_table?
set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(__pa(pmd_table) | _PAGE_PRESENT));
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
if (pmd_table != pmd_offset(pud, 0))
BUG();
#else
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
pmd_tabl...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 1/5] Paravirt page alloc.patch
..._pte,
.set_pte_at = native_set_pte_at,
.set_pmd = native_set_pmd,
===================================================================
--- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
pmd_table = (pmd_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(__pa(pmd_table) | _PAGE_PRESENT));
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
if (pmd_table != pmd_offset(pud, 0))
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_ta...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 1/5] Paravirt page alloc.patch
..._pte,
.set_pte_at = native_set_pte_at,
.set_pmd = native_set_pmd,
===================================================================
--- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
pmd_table = (pmd_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(__pa(pmd_table) | _PAGE_PRESENT));
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
if (pmd_table != pmd_offset(pud, 0))
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_ta...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 1/6] Page allocation hooks for VMI backend
..._pte,
.set_pte_at = native_set_pte_at,
.set_pmd = native_set_pmd,
===================================================================
--- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
pmd_table = (pmd_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(__pa(pmd_table) | _PAGE_PRESENT));
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
if (pmd_table != pmd_offset(pud, 0))
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_ta...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 1/6] Page allocation hooks for VMI backend
..._pte,
.set_pte_at = native_set_pte_at,
.set_pmd = native_set_pmd,
===================================================================
--- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
pmd_table = (pmd_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(__pa(pmd_table) | _PAGE_PRESENT));
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
if (pmd_table != pmd_offset(pud, 0))
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_ta...
2007 Apr 18
2
pgd_alloc and [cd]tors
Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given
that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just
fold the [cd]tor in?
I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and
it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making
pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code.
Would need to sort out the
2007 Apr 18
2
pgd_alloc and [cd]tors
Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given
that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just
fold the [cd]tor in?
I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and
it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making
pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code.
Would need to sort out the
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/5] Add pagetable allocation notifiers
...=============================
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2005-08-24 09:31:05.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2005-08-24 09:31:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_table = (pte_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ SetPagePTE(virt_to_page(page_table));
set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(__pa(page_table) | _PAGE_TABLE));
if (page_table != pte_offset_kernel(pmd, 0))
BUG();
Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/5] Add pagetable allocation notifiers
...=============================
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2005-08-24 09:31:05.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2005-08-24 09:31:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_table = (pte_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ SetPagePTE(virt_to_page(page_table));
set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(__pa(page_table) | _PAGE_TABLE));
if (page_table != pte_offset_kernel(pmd, 0))
BUG();
Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13...
2008 Nov 13
69
[PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support
Hi Ingo,
Here''s the chunk of patches to add Xen Dom0 support (it''s probably
worth creating a new xen/dom0 topic branch for it).
A dom0 Xen domain is basically the same as a normal domU domain, but
it has extra privileges to directly access hardware. There are two
issues to deal with:
- translating to and from the domain''s pseudo-physical addresses and
real machine
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 19/24] i386 Vmi mmu changes
...15:57:08.000000000 -0800
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
pmd_table = pmd_offset(pud, 0);
#endif
-
return pmd_table;
}
@@ -81,6 +80,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_table = (pte_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ mach_setup_pte(__pa(page_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(__pa(page_table) | _PAGE_TABLE));
if (page_table != pte_offset_kernel(pmd, 0))
BUG();
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void __init pagetable_init (void)
*/
set_pgd(&pgd_base[0], pgd_base[USER_PTR...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 19/24] i386 Vmi mmu changes
...15:57:08.000000000 -0800
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static pmd_t * __init one_md_table_init(
pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
pmd_table = pmd_offset(pud, 0);
#endif
-
return pmd_table;
}
@@ -81,6 +80,7 @@ static pte_t * __init one_page_table_ini
{
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
pte_t *page_table = (pte_t *) alloc_bootmem_low_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
+ mach_setup_pte(__pa(page_table) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(__pa(page_table) | _PAGE_TABLE));
if (page_table != pte_offset_kernel(pmd, 0))
BUG();
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void __init pagetable_init (void)
*/
set_pgd(&pgd_base[0], pgd_base[USER_PTR...
2007 Apr 18
17
[patch 00/17] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the
changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces
necessary for Xen.
The brief overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed
paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently
paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack
2007 Apr 18
17
[patch 00/17] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the
changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces
necessary for Xen.
The brief overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed
paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently
paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack
2007 Apr 18
23
[patch 00/20] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day.
Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering,
cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery.
Overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch
obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch
No longer meaningful or needed.
paravirt-nop.patch
Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to
2007 Apr 18
23
[patch 00/20] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day.
Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering,
cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery.
Overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch
obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch
No longer meaningful or needed.
paravirt-nop.patch
Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to