search for: alives

Hello Folks, I have 5 columns for thousands of tree records that record whether that tree was alive or dead. I want to recode the columns such that the cell reads "found" when a live tree is first observed, "alive" for when a tree is found alive and is not just found, and "mort" when it was previously alive but is now dead. Given the following: > tree_live

Hi! I want to choose part of the data. But it has a question. > attach(PIKO) > PIKO[1:5,] code species dbh x y tag status branch 92 10142 PIKO 38.9 6.05 12.81 10165 alive 0 109 10213 PIKO 41.0 6.71 26.21 10202 alive 0 135 10222 PIKO 48.3 18.98 21.28 10214 alive 0 146 10223 PIKO 47.0 19.45 22.83 10224 alive 0 147 10223 PIKO 20.0 19.74

Not sure how off-topic this is, but should we consider/have we considered porting our InstCombines to Alive? The PLDI '15 paper even demos C++ extraction from Alive theorems. I think it'd be a small step from that to extracting tightly optimized VM code, not unlike what Tablegen emits. Everything would be so clean and readable and organized. And edge cases can still be handled manually,

Sorry, we really screwed up the server migration. Alive is now working again and should be fixed for good :) Permalinks are still missing; we are working on recovering those. Apologies again for all the trouble. Nuno -----Original Message----- From: Sanjay Patel Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Where did Alive go? I still can't use the web app - spins for

Craig I know it's a pain compared to the web interface but Alive is pretty easy to install and run from a shell. John On 9/22/17 11:41 AM, Craig Topper via llvm-dev wrote: > And now rise4fun.com <http://rise4fun.com> doesn't work at all? > > ~Craig > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt > <mailto:nunoplopes at

Hi Sanjay, You used Alive correctly, of course :) At this moment we cannot give you the best precondition. It’s on the todo list, but it’s not even started yet. It’s a much harder problem to solve. We do have a mode to compute the best set of nsw/nuw/exact attributes in the transformed expression, but it’s not enabled on the web interface yet (InstCombine was missing quite a few cases last

Alive is now working again. There was a migration to a new server. Permalinks are still being copied from backup; they will work again shortly as well. (I would probably not create new ones since they may get replaced while the copy is in flux). Nuno Citando Nuno Lopes via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I'm investigating; thanks for the heads up. Sorry for the

And now rise4fun.com doesn't work at all? ~Craig On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Alive is now working again. There was a migration to a new server. > Permalinks are still being copied from backup; they will work again > shortly as well. (I would probably not create new ones since they may get > replaced while the copy is in

Hi, I'm interested in using apply() with t.test() on a data.frame. Specifically, I'd like to use apply() to do the following: t.test(raw.sample[1,alive],raw.sample[1,dead]) t.test(raw.sample[2,alive],raw.sample[2,dead]) t.test(raw.sample[3,alive],raw.sample[3,dead]) etc. I tried the following, apply(raw.sample,1,function(x) t.test(raw.sample[,alive],raw.sample[,dead])) but it gives

Hi! I want to use the package "SPLANCE" to do Ripley's K analysis I have a basic question about the package. I try to find how to do it, but I cannot. I hope you can help me. I donot know how to change my data form to "point data set". my data form is: > qumo[1:5,] code species dbh x y tag status branch 223 10312 QUMO 54.5 7.83 44.80 10306 alive

Hi, Just a short email to announce that Alive is now available online: http://rise4fun.com/Alive The site includes a few examples (both correct and buggy). You can also create a "permalink" to send the proof to someone else. The execution time is limited to 30 seconds for now. You may want to constrain the operand's types if the tool times out, for example. The service is

Hi all, Anyone know how to make asterisk properly reply to options keep-alive? Or just force a 200 OK somehow? I recently took over a server and they have ~80 pap2 devices that send nat keep-alive and * always replies with 481 No subscription. It's more of an annoyance, I know but I like to keep my pcap's clean. S. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

This no longer works http://rise4fun.com/Alive ~Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170919/1a9c951b/attachment.html>

It appears as though the 489 Bad Event response to the NAT keep alive event responds to the local address, instead of responding to the NATted address. This causes Linksys phones to go amber (no registration) after a short amount of time after placing calls. Turning the Linksys NAT keep alive off is a workound, but non-ideal in may situations. Apparently the asterisk devs don't even think

Hello Everyone, Would it be posiable to add a "keep alive" option to rsync. The problem I am having is that the connection is dropped while rsync is scanning the local directory. If "null" packets are send to the server every 60 seconds or so, the connection will stay up and the sync will work. Or maybe there is an option that does this already ? Thanks, Pieter De Wit

Hello, I have a bandwidth-constrained connection that I'd like to run rsync over through an SSH tunnel. I also want to detect any network drops pretty rapidly. On the servers I'm setting (via sshd_config): ClientAliveCountMax 5 ClientAliveInterval 1 TCPKeepAlive no and on the clients I'm setting (via ssh_config): ServerAliveCountMax 5 ServerAliveInterval 1 TCPKeepAlive no After

I'm investigating; thanks for the heads up. Sorry for the trouble. Nuno -----Original Message----- From: Craig Topper via llvm-dev Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:52 PM Subject: [llvm-dev] Where did Alive go? This no longer works http://rise4fun.com/Alive ~Craig

Hi I have a problem with this error, I have searched the archives and found previous discussion about this, can I cannot understand how the explanations apply to what I am trying to do. I am trying to do Log_rank Survival analysis, I have included tables and str command, is it a factor/integer problem? If so how do I correct this, as all my attempt to recode the data have failed. >

Hi, Can you add the following two publications from our group to the LLVM publications page. - *Alive-FP: Automated Verification of Floating Point Based Peephole Optimizations in LLVM [pdf] <http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~santosh.nagarakatte/papers/alive-fp-sas16.pdf> *David Menendez, Santosh Nagarakatte, and Aarti Gupta *To Appear in the Proceedings of the 23rd Static Analysis

Hi, > > - r = ttm_bo_reserve(&bo->tbo, true, false, NULL); > > + r = reservation_object_lock_interruptible(bo->gem_base.resv, NULL); > Can you elaborate a bit about how TTM keeps the BOs alive in, for > example, virtio_gpu_transfer_from_host_ioctl? In that function, only > three TTM functions are called: ttm_bo_reserve, ttm_bo_validate, and >