search for: alina

On 2/10/20 2:35 PM, Alina Sbirlea wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a tentative patch of the changes for this: D74353 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D74353>. I suppose that, as expected, it's invalidated less often this way. Given that it's generally stateless, does this really represent a cost savings?...

Hi all, After a long ride, I'm planning to turn on the use of MemorySSA for loop passes (D58311 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58311>) tomorrow (8/29). Please let me know if you have issues, concerns or feedback on this. Best, Alina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190828/992cc4d3/attachment.html>

...0.0317 ( 29.4%) 3.0804 ( 58.2%) 3.1331 ( 58.3%) Memory SSA with alias followed by getModRefInfo 2.2487 ( 52.9%) 0.0259 ( 27.1%) 2.2746 ( 52.4%) 2.2820 ( 52.4%) Memory SSA etc Not entirely sure what is going on. But if alias is free, problem solved! On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Alina Sbirlea <alina.sbirlea at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Alina Sbirlea <alina.sbirlea at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> >>> FWIW: Bootstrap is p...

...ysis is also being updated in MemDepAnalysis (D48489 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D48489>) and BasicAA is invalidated if PhiValuesAnalysis gets invalidated. I may not have the full context here, so I'd like some feedback: does it make sense to make BasicAA a CFG-only pass again? Thank you, Alina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200210/1f57ad9e/attachment.html>

...rly rare in bootstrap, as you can see. > Let me get you some test cases. > SG, thanks! > > My guess is that we should go with mustmod. > > > As for callsites, adding mustmod works for call, memloc and call, call > testing. > > > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017, 4:48 PM Alina Sbirlea <alina.sbirlea at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This came up in https://reviews.llvm.org/D38569, and I'd like some input >> on what's the best way to get alias and mod-ref info without having two >> alias calls. >> >> A coup...

...recurring meeting to monthly for which I'll adjust the day/time based on the doodle poll results, and we can adjust frequency based on how useful folks find it. The meeting information can be found in the above google doc. Please let me know if you have additional feedback or questions. Best, Alina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201012/ec6fae15/attachment.html>

..."is this pointer captured". But, while building MemorySSA, there are a lot of queries asking if a pointer is captured. With MemorySSA we know we benefit from reusing the info it stores, so having passes update it makes sense. Does that makes sense, or did I misunderstand your question? Alina On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:23 PM Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 3/4/19 7:08 PM, Alina Sbirlea via llvm-dev wrote: > > TL;DR: I'm looking to have AliasAnalysis passes have the ability keep a > temporary cache when no transformations are performed. > &g...

...f volatile loads? I was looking at this testcase: test/Transforms/LICM/volatile-alias.ll Context: MemorySSA treats volatile loads as defs. I'm looking to better understand expected behavior in the presence of volatile accesses. More context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40375. Thanks in advance, Alina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171219/ebbf37b4/attachment.html>

Thank you Michael, Curves for each level of the factor sounds very interesting, Do you have a suggestion how to plot them? Thank you! Alina *Alina Vodonos Zilberg* On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> wrote: > Dear Alina > > If I understand you correctly you cannot just have a single predicted > curve but one for each level of your factor. > > > On 09/08/2017 16:24...

...at <- data.frame(x=seq(min(meta$x), max(meta$x),,118)) # I have 118 observations. #How do I add the factor variable to my newdat? newdat$pred <- predict(mod, newdat,level = 0,type="response") plot(B ~ x, data=meta) lines(B ~ x, data=newdat) Can you please assist me ? Thank you! Alina [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...the current "global" iterators with class specific ones, they are already used as such. But perhaps I don't have the full picture. In the first patch I put up, the iterators added inside BasicBlock can co-exist with the global ones, so the switch can be done incrementally. Thanks, Alina On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 4:16 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:57 PM Alina Sbirlea via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As part of an ongoing work to extend the GraphDiff (this mod...

...I took is to first link all bitcode files into a single one, then obtain the assembly for it, which cmake knows to take as an input source. A separate discussion is on reading metadata (mcpu and mattr) in llc. I added a script to work around that for now. Looking forward to your feedback! Thanks, Alina On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > > On 18/02/2016 19:12, Alina Sbirlea via llvm-dev wrote: > > > >> I have more questions for Alina. What kind of tests do you have: >> >> - "the compiler takes the...

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:30 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:31 AM Alina Sbirlea <alina.sbirlea at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> It may be possible to do this with the current API, but what I was >> looking for is a common API for existing block types. For example there is >> no succ_begin for Machine BasicBlock. >&...

...iming test I timed the llvm bootstrap build with 1 vs 2 alias calls in D38569: instructionClobbersQuery:296, and got the following: 2 alias calls: real 62m52.627s user 2769m46.964s sys 17m48.072s 1 alias call: real 62m56.659s user 2766m40.452s sys 17m46.312s Thoughts? Thanks, Alina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171009/695af180/attachment.html>

Dear Alina If I understand you correctly you cannot just have a single predicted curve but one for each level of your factor. On 09/08/2017 16:24, Alina Vodonos Zilberg wrote: > Hi, > > I am performing meta-regression using linear mixed-effect model with the > lme() function that has two fixed...

...-Hal Hal Finkel Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory ________________________________ From: Tarique Islam <tislam at ca.ibm.com> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 8:19:31 AM To: Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov> Cc: Alina Sbirlea <alina.sbirlea at gmail.com>; Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov>; Jeroen Dobbelaere <Jeroen.Dobbelaere at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] LLVM Alias Analysis Technical Call - Doodle Poll Hi Hal,...

> On Feb 29, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Alina Sbirlea via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > All, > > To get the discussion going in a focused manner, here is an initial patch with a running test. The test is from the Halide suite and is checking the correctness of several simd operations. > (Notes: the pat...

> On Feb 29, 2016, at 10:50 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > > From: "Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Alina Sbirlea" <alina.sbirlea at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 7:06:51 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Add bitcode tests to test-suite > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 29, 2016,...

...should just hide all that in inline functions or something and make it an enum class Noted, and looking into this option. Hoping a couple of static functions (e.g. mods(), refs(), isMust(), addMust()) will be more intuitive than the bit-wise ops. Should also make it easier to understand and prove. Alina On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > Maybe we should just hide all that in inline functions or something and > make it an enum class > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, 7:28 AM Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > >>...

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 10/10/2017 02:49 PM, Alina Sbirlea wrote: > > Sigh >> I should have taken the time to give a better example. >> The must-alias part is irrelevant to an example (it only requires >> read-onlyness) >> >> You said "LICM doesn't move calls, so we'd never really care about >>...