Displaying 20 results from an estimated 82 matches for "aligments".
Did you mean:
alignments
2017 Jul 11
2
Extremely slow du
Hi Kashif,
Thank you for your feedback! Do you have some data on the nature of
performance improvement observed with 3.11 in the new setup?
Adding Raghavendra and Poornima for validation of configuration and help
with identifying why certain files disappeared from the mount point
after enabling readdir-optimize.
Regards,
Vijay
On 07/11/2017 11:06 AM, mohammad kashif wrote:
> Hi Vijay and
2009 Dec 30
2
Positioning plots on top of each other (aligment & borders)
Hello,
I want to place two plots on top of each other. However, the problem
is that I can't figure out a simple way to align them correctly. Is
there a way to specify this?
Since the data is bunch of coordinates and the second layer is an
outline of a map (a .ps file I import using the grImport package), I
suppose one option would be to specify a set of "artificial"
coordinates that
2007 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] another problem with function arguments aligment
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
> The problem is: llvm-gcc generates the same bytecode for both functions:
>
> declare void @f(i32, i64)
> declare void @g(i32, i64)
>
> I can't differ an i64 argument from a struct argument.
Oops. You can fix this by changing llvm-gcc: gcc/llvm-abi.h
Grep for instances of Int64Ty there. I can help answer any q's you
2015 Sep 29
10
[PATCH 0/2] Fixes for gcc 5
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com>
TL;DR: The section aligment in linker scripts messed-up the memory mapping
needed for the compression / decompression to work.
The bug with gcc 5 is not trivial, I'll do my best to explain it here.
Basically, there are two memory mappings of the code. One in "virtual memory",
and one in "load memory". The one in
2007 Feb 26
3
[LLVMdev] another problem with function arguments aligment
The ARM EABI (AAPCS) defines:
- i64 values are 8-bytes aligned
- "The alignment of an aggregate shall be the alignment of its
most-aligned component."
So,
struct ss {
int x;
int y;
};
void f(int a, struct ss b);
r0 <- a
r1-r2 <- b
void g(int a, long long b);
r0 <- a
r2-r3 <- b
The problem is: llvm-gcc generates the same bytecode for both functions:
declare void
2017 Jun 18
1
Extremely slow du
Hi Mohammad,
A lot of time is being spent in addressing metadata calls as expected. Can
you consider testing out with 3.11 with md-cache [1] and readdirp [2]
improvements?
Adding Poornima and Raghavendra who worked on these enhancements to help
out further.
Thanks,
Vijay
[1] https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release-notes/3.9.0/
[2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/166
On
2012 Apr 11
0
phangorn and calculation of a rate matrix
Hi, I'm trying to calculate a ratematrix for a RNA aligment (U instead of T)
in order to use it as a ratematrix in Profidst (a phylogenetic program which
takes into account both the primary sequence and the secondary structure of
the RNA, in my case rRNA). The sequence-structure aligment has been made in
4SALE (a java app) and saved as one-letter encoded (using a 12 letters
alphabet,
2007 Feb 27
2
[LLVMdev] another problem with function arguments aligment
I think, we must move function arguments lowering from frontend to
LLVM core. This lowering is generating machine dependent bytecode. See
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
Lauro
2007/2/26, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
> > The problem is: llvm-gcc generates the same bytecode for both functions:
> >
> >
2017 Jun 16
0
Extremely slow du
Hi Vijay
Did you manage to look into the gluster profile logs ?
Thanks
Kashif
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:40 AM, mohammad kashif <kashif.alig at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Vijay
>
> I have enabled client profiling and used this script
> https://github.com/bengland2/gluster-profile-analysis/blob/
> master/gvp-client.sh to extract data. I am attaching output files. I
>
2017 Jun 12
2
Extremely slow du
Hi Vijay
I have enabled client profiling and used this script
https://github.com/bengland2/gluster-profile-analysis/blob/master/gvp-client.sh
to extract data. I am attaching output files. I don't have any reference
data to compare with my output. Hopefully you can make some sense out of
it.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote:
> Would it be
2015 Sep 29
0
[PATCH 0/2] Fixes for gcc 5
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:46 AM, celelibi--- via Syslinux
<syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
> From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com>
>
> TL;DR: The section aligment in linker scripts messed-up the memory mapping
> needed for the compression / decompression to work.
>
> The bug with gcc 5 is not trivial, I'll do my best to explain it here.
>
>
2008 Jul 02
2
FXTextField and text alignment
Hi,
When the text inside an FXTextField is larger that the available space,
the FXTextField apparently "switches" from left alignment to right
aligment: you only see the end of the text. When the text is smaller
than the available space, text is aligned on the left.
Is there a way to change that, and have left alignment all the time?
I''ve been trying a few things, like
2011 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] Structure Types and ABI sizes
Hi!
I followed the discussion on structure types with the example
struct I {
int a;
char b;
};
struct J : I {
char c;
};
Dave said that this translates to
%I = type { i32, i8, i16 }
%J = type { %I, i8, i16 }
because the frontend has to communicate the ABI to llvm since llvm is
language agnostic.
What I really wonder is why it isn't
%I = type { i32, i8 }
%J = type { %I, i16, i8
2018 May 01
0
Usage monitoring per user
Hi,
There are several programs that will basically take the outputs of your
scans and store the results in a database. If you size the database
appropriately, then querying that database will be much quicker than
querying the filesystem. But of course the results will be a little bit
outdated.
One such project is robinhood. https://github.com/cea-hpc/robinhood/wiki
A simpler way might be to
2018 May 01
2
Usage monitoring per user
Hi
Is there any easy way to find usage per user in Gluster? We have 300TB
storage with almost 100 million files. Running du take too much time. Are
people aware of any other tool which can be used to break up storage per
user?
Thanks
Kashif
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2017 Jun 09
2
Extremely slow du
Hi Vijay
Thanks for your quick response. I am using gluster 3.8.11 on Centos 7
servers
glusterfs-3.8.11-1.el7.x86_64
clients are centos 6 but I tested with a centos 7 client as well and
results didn't change
gluster volume info Volume Name: atlasglust
Type: Distribute
Volume ID: fbf0ebb8-deab-4388-9d8a-f722618a624b
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 5
Transport-type: tcp
2017 Jun 10
0
Extremely slow du
Would it be possible for you to turn on client profiling and then run du?
Instructions for turning on client profiling can be found at [1]. Providing
the client profile information can help us figure out where the latency
could be stemming from.
Regards,
Vijay
[1]
https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Performance%20Testing/#client-side-profiling
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at
2011 Jun 26
2
[LLVMdev] Can LLVM jitter emit the native code in continuous memory addresses ?
**
I have question relating to LLVM Jitter: Can i obligue the LLVM Jitter to
emit the native code in continuous memory addresses ? and to be PIC ? what i
want to do is to move the JIT code to another process in order to execute
it, my approach is to save the JIT code in buffer i will save it to file and
pass it to the execution process.
what i mean by "load" is to simply read the bits
2018 May 02
1
Usage monitoring per user
I rather like agedu It probably does what you want.
But as Mohammad says you do have to traverse your filesystem.
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
agedu: track down wasted disk space - chiark home page<https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/>
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk
agedu. a Unix utility for tracking down wasted disk space Introduction. Suppose
2015 May 28
2
Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] resize: add support for logical partitions for calculate_surplus
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:51:30AM -0400, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> Add support for logical partitions.
> - count number of logical_partition (we've split partitions list)
> - don't count size of extended partition
> For it'll duplicate with logical partition, we'll count it later
> - we need at leat 1 gap between logical partitions.
> so --aligment=1 will be