search for: aligent

Hi Kashif, Thank you for your feedback! Do you have some data on the nature of performance improvement observed with 3.11 in the new setup? Adding Raghavendra and Poornima for validation of configuration and help with identifying why certain files disappeared from the mount point after enabling readdir-optimize. Regards, Vijay On 07/11/2017 11:06 AM, mohammad kashif wrote: > Hi Vijay and

Hello, I want to place two plots on top of each other. However, the problem is that I can't figure out a simple way to align them correctly. Is there a way to specify this? Since the data is bunch of coordinates and the second layer is an outline of a map (a .ps file I import using the grImport package), I suppose one option would be to specify a set of "artificial" coordinates that

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > The problem is: llvm-gcc generates the same bytecode for both functions: > > declare void @f(i32, i64) > declare void @g(i32, i64) > > I can't differ an i64 argument from a struct argument. Oops. You can fix this by changing llvm-gcc: gcc/llvm-abi.h Grep for instances of Int64Ty there. I can help answer any q's you

From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> TL;DR: The section aligment in linker scripts messed-up the memory mapping needed for the compression / decompression to work. The bug with gcc 5 is not trivial, I'll do my best to explain it here. Basically, there are two memory mappings of the code. One in "virtual memory", and one in "load memory". The one in

The ARM EABI (AAPCS) defines: - i64 values are 8-bytes aligned - "The alignment of an aggregate shall be the alignment of its most-aligned component." So, struct ss { int x; int y; }; void f(int a, struct ss b); r0 <- a r1-r2 <- b void g(int a, long long b); r0 <- a r2-r3 <- b The problem is: llvm-gcc generates the same bytecode for both functions: declare void

Hi Mohammad, A lot of time is being spent in addressing metadata calls as expected. Can you consider testing out with 3.11 with md-cache [1] and readdirp [2] improvements? Adding Poornima and Raghavendra who worked on these enhancements to help out further. Thanks, Vijay [1] https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release-notes/3.9.0/ [2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/166 On

Hi, I'm trying to calculate a ratematrix for a RNA aligment (U instead of T) in order to use it as a ratematrix in Profidst (a phylogenetic program which takes into account both the primary sequence and the secondary structure of the RNA, in my case rRNA). The sequence-structure aligment has been made in 4SALE (a java app) and saved as one-letter encoded (using a 12 letters alphabet,

I think, we must move function arguments lowering from frontend to LLVM core. This lowering is generating machine dependent bytecode. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1230 Lauro 2007/2/26, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > > The problem is: llvm-gcc generates the same bytecode for both functions: > > > >

Hi Vijay Did you manage to look into the gluster profile logs ? Thanks Kashif On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:40 AM, mohammad kashif <kashif.alig at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Vijay > > I have enabled client profiling and used this script > https://github.com/bengland2/gluster-profile-analysis/blob/ > master/gvp-client.sh to extract data. I am attaching output files. I >

Hi Vijay I have enabled client profiling and used this script https://github.com/bengland2/gluster-profile-analysis/blob/master/gvp-client.sh to extract data. I am attaching output files. I don't have any reference data to compare with my output. Hopefully you can make some sense out of it. On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: > Would it be

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:46 AM, celelibi--- via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> > > TL;DR: The section aligment in linker scripts messed-up the memory mapping > needed for the compression / decompression to work. > > The bug with gcc 5 is not trivial, I'll do my best to explain it here. > >

Hi, When the text inside an FXTextField is larger that the available space, the FXTextField apparently "switches" from left alignment to right aligment: you only see the end of the text. When the text is smaller than the available space, text is aligned on the left. Is there a way to change that, and have left alignment all the time? I''ve been trying a few things, like

Hi! I followed the discussion on structure types with the example struct I { int a; char b; }; struct J : I { char c; }; Dave said that this translates to %I = type { i32, i8, i16 } %J = type { %I, i8, i16 } because the frontend has to communicate the ABI to llvm since llvm is language agnostic. What I really wonder is why it isn't %I = type { i32, i8 } %J = type { %I, i16, i8

Hi, There are several programs that will basically take the outputs of your scans and store the results in a database. If you size the database appropriately, then querying that database will be much quicker than querying the filesystem. But of course the results will be a little bit outdated. One such project is robinhood. https://github.com/cea-hpc/robinhood/wiki A simpler way might be to

Hi Is there any easy way to find usage per user in Gluster? We have 300TB storage with almost 100 million files. Running du take too much time. Are people aware of any other tool which can be used to break up storage per user? Thanks Kashif -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Vijay Thanks for your quick response. I am using gluster 3.8.11 on Centos 7 servers glusterfs-3.8.11-1.el7.x86_64 clients are centos 6 but I tested with a centos 7 client as well and results didn't change gluster volume info Volume Name: atlasglust Type: Distribute Volume ID: fbf0ebb8-deab-4388-9d8a-f722618a624b Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 5 Transport-type: tcp

Would it be possible for you to turn on client profiling and then run du? Instructions for turning on client profiling can be found at [1]. Providing the client profile information can help us figure out where the latency could be stemming from. Regards, Vijay [1] https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Performance%20Testing/#client-side-profiling On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at

** I have question relating to LLVM Jitter: Can i obligue the LLVM Jitter to emit the native code in continuous memory addresses ? and to be PIC ? what i want to do is to move the JIT code to another process in order to execute it, my approach is to save the JIT code in buffer i will save it to file and pass it to the execution process. what i mean by "load" is to simply read the bits

I rather like agedu It probably does what you want. But as Mohammad says you do have to traverse your filesystem. https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/ agedu: track down wasted disk space - chiark home page<https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/> www.chiark.greenend.org.uk agedu. a Unix utility for tracking down wasted disk space Introduction. Suppose

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:51:30AM -0400, Chen Hanxiao wrote: > Add support for logical partitions. > - count number of logical_partition (we've split partitions list) > - don't count size of extended partition > For it'll duplicate with logical partition, we'll count it later > - we need at leat 1 gap between logical partitions. > so --aligment=1 will be