Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "alias_path".
2013 Mar 13
1
[LLVMdev] PROPOSAL: struct-access-path aware TBAA (should we use offset+size instead of path?)
...I suggested replacing it, you said my replacement would
> be difficult to generate.
That is the point of misunderstanding :]
Generating offset+size is not hard.
I was asking about how to answer alias(x,y) if we only have offset+size+outmost type.
Let's call the alias rule with access path: alias_path(x,y)
and call the alias rule with offset+size: alias_offset(x,y)
In order to have same answers from alias_path and alias_offset, I thought we have to regenerate the access path at IR level from the offset+size+outmost type information.
The regeneration is not easy.
> So what i started to ask i...
2013 Mar 13
0
[LLVMdev] PROPOSAL: struct-access-path aware TBAA
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:56 PM,
2013 Mar 13
3
[LLVMdev] PROPOSAL: struct-access-path aware TBAA
On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:23 PM,