search for: alexfh

Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having issues but the other documentation has been fixed. -Tanya > On Feb 14, 2019, at 3:53 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > > Tanya, friendly ping. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:21 PM Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com <mailto:alexfh at google.com>> wrote: > Hi Tanya, > > Last time I noticed a problem with clang-tools-extra docs you could help solving...

...27/04/2016 à 13:06, Alexander Kornienko a écrit : > ... and http://llvm-jenkins.debian.net/ seems to be down. Sorry for > bugging you with all of this, and thanks for fixing the > clang-modernize thingy so quickly! > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Alexander Kornienko > <alexfh at google.com <mailto:alexfh at google.com>> wrote: > > While you're here, Xenial (15.10) seems wrong (should be 16.04 LTS). > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Sylvestre Ledru > <sylvestre at debian.org <mailto:sylvestre at debian.org>> wrote:...

...ted > then to "apt-get install [..etc..] clang-modernize-3.8 [..etc..]" (see > under "Install > > (qualification branch)"). Should probably be updated - thank you > Benjamin for asking. > > > > On 26 April 2016 at 18:28, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com > <mailto:alexfh at google.com>> wrote: > > > > The docs are in a good shape in this regard: > > > > http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-modernize.html > > > http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clan...

Ping. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > Ping. > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim G...

...a > > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having issues but the > other documentation has been fixed. > > -Tanya > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 3:53 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> > wrote: > > Tanya, friendly ping. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:21 PM Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Tanya, >> >> Last time I noticed a problem with clang-tools-extra docs you could help >> solving th...

Ping. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clat...

This is Chris' call to make, imo. -j On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > Ping. > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > Ping. > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard...

...it should not be suggested then > to "apt-get install [..etc..] clang-modernize-3.8 [..etc..]" (see under > "Install > (qualification branch)"). Should probably be updated - thank you Benjamin > for asking. > > On 26 April 2016 at 18:28, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > >> The docs are in a good shape in this regard: >> >> http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-modernize.html >> >> http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-modernize.html >> >> >> Apparently, it doesn...

http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html currently mentions Python 2.5 as a minimum required version. I'd like to use argparse <https://docs.python.org/dev/library/argparse.html> in a script and be able to test this script. This requires Python 2.7. This version has been around since 2010, and afaiu, is available on all modern platforms. Is there any reason not to change minimum required

Hi Tanya, Last time I noticed a problem with clang-tools-extra docs you could help solving them. If someone else is taking care of this part of the infrastructure now, please redirect appropriately. It looks like docs generated from rst (for LLVM, Clang and clang-tools-extra) don't get updated at the moment. They stopped updating somewhere between r353327

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> > <dropping llvm-commits> >> > >> > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander

...s are available at: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/ppc64le-sanitizer/builds/0 > > Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ > > Buildslave for this Build: ppc64le-sanitizer > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] 225670 > Blamelist: ab,abataev,alexfh,artagnon,benlangmuir,chandlerc,chapuni,compnerd,dexonsmith,djasper,dsanders,ehsan,eugenis,foad,gribozavr,hfinkel,jhibbits,jkolek,joerg,majnemer,matze,nathan,rafael,rdivacky,rksimon,rsmith,rtrieu,sanjoy,seurer,spatel,timurrrr,tomatabacu,tstellar > > BUILD FAILED: failed annotate > > sinc...

Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. *INTRODUCTION* The switch construct of C/C++ languages allows fall-throughs between switch labels when control flow is not directed

...*[[clang::fallthrough]]*attribute (which is also implemented, of course). I only need an approval from community to add this macro and replace comment-only fall-through annotations with the *LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;* macro. > -Cameron > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > >> Is anyone interested in introducing fall-through annotations and the >> related diagnostic in LLVM/Clang code? >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi llvmd...

The docs are in a good shape in this regard: http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-modernize.html http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-modernize.html Apparently, it doesn't make the fact more discoverable though. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Benjamin Kramer via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > clang-modernize was folded into clang-tidy

...at: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-mingw64-win7/builds/876 > > Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ > > Buildslave for this Build: sschiffli1 > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] 162350 > Blamelist: aaronballman,ahatanak,alexfh,anithab,asl,baldrick,bwilson,chandlerc,chapuni,criswell,ctopper,d0k,dblaikie,ddunbar,delesley,dgregor,djasper,dyatkovskiy,echristo,efriedma,evancheng,fjahanian,gps,gribozavr,grosbach,grosser,hanm,hans,hliao,jacksprat,jaykang10,jrose,jush,kcc,klimek,kremenek,matthewbg,mcrosier,mspencer,nadav,nichola...

I've started using YAML I/O in clang-format configuration parser, and stumbled upon a bug with handling empty input string. While filing it ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15927), I've found another bug which hasn't been answered to since March ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15505). So, the question is: how ready is YAML I/O ready for using in production code? Thanks!

...d64-openbsd/builds/1103 > > Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ > > Buildslave for this Build: openbsd-buildslave > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] 189664 > Blamelist: aaronballman,ab,adibiagio,adrian,ahatanak,ajbernal,akaylor,akirtzidis,alexfh,arnolds,arsenm,atrick,ayartsev,bwilson,carlokok,cdavis,chandlerc,chapuni,compnerd,ctopper,d0k,daenzer,dblaikie,ddunbar,delena,delesley,dgregor,dirty,djasper,dsanders,dvyukov,echristo,efriedma,enderby,enea,eugenis,faisalv,fangism,filcab,fjahanian,gribozavr,grosbach,hanm,hans,haoliu,hfinkel,jacksprat...

Hello Chris, We're using LLVM CommandLine 2.0 Library in the clang-check tool. Overall it works fine for us, but there are a couple of problems related to the library design and current usage patterns. First, there's a feature<http://llvm.org/docs/CommandLine.html#exploiting-external-storage> : *"Several of the LLVM libraries define static cl::opt instances that will

...ng the right compiler & libstdc++ installed), compared to the 3 minutes it typically takes to install any Python version on any Linux box, these limitations always strike me as silly. But I gave up on this fight some time ago. Eli > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 17:11, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html currently mentions Python 2.5 as > a minimum required version. I'd like to use argparse > <https://docs.python.org/dev/library/argparse.html> in a script and be > able to test this script. This requires P...