search for: aleph1

...r community. Thanks to all involved parties for helping make that come true.) --Up. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Forwarding headers mangle patches. Mind the gap. --Up. ------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ------- From: Aleph One <aleph1@DFW.NET> Sender: Bugtraq List <BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Linux F00F Patch Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 18:45:15 -0600 Reply-To: Aleph One <aleph1@DFW.NET> This are the relevant parts of the linux kernel 2.1.63 patch that fix the Pentium bug that Alan me...

Hi, This advisory has a bit more than the Red Hat one.... Roger. ----- Forwarded message from Alfred Huger ----- >>From owner-bugtraq@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Mon Nov 22 18:49:41 1999 Approved-By: aleph1@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9911220906250.11753-100000@www.securityfocus.com> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:08:08 -0800 X-Reply-To: Alfred Huger <ah@SECURITYFOCUS.COM> Sender: Bugtraq List <BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM> From: Alfred Huger <ah@SECURITYFOCUS.CO...

...,and the rest of t0xyn , and my friend [oO giemor Oo] <yes i have a sploit :) ,kod,theblade,reformed,m0sfet,kewl,oldmaster,owl,th0s gigaacidbrutalhardcorebigextra greetz to da Beautiful: Heike <i'am in heIk3c0re>. big up to: da movement <stay cool ! >. codeurz greetz going to: aleph1 <the guru its ALL !> & to samba team <i love samba :) really !> anal greetz: #banane suxxxxxxxxxxx Hotlame & Co <kill diz lamer> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ explain of the bug: is really simple if your send a large passw...

Hi All, I'm experiencing a problem with some mails in deliver. Here the logged error message: deliver(stefan at roese.nl): 2009-05-06 11:57:36 Panic: file index-mail-headers.c: line 141 (index_mail_parse_header_finish): assertion failed: ((match[match_idx] & HEADER_MATCH_FLAG_FOUND) == 0) deliver(stefan at roese.nl): 2009-05-06 11:57:36 Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver

...16.102.46.4) by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 1999 19:14:06 -0000 Received: from LISTS.SECURITYFOCUS.COM by LISTS.SECURITYFOCUS.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 202945 for BUGTRAQ@LISTS.SECURITYFOCUS.COM; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 12:12:44 -0700 Approved-By: aleph1@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Received: from securityfocus.com (216.102.46.2) by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 1999 16:56:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 2198 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 1999 16:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Received: (qmail 2195 invoked from network); 27 Ju...

....8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id BAA03848 for <BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG>; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 01:35:06 -0500 Received: from unknown@netspace.org (port 25452 [128.148.157.6]) by brimstone.netspace.org with ESMTP id <462-20254>; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 01:35:00 -0500 Approved-By: aleph1@UNDERGROUND.ORG Received: from resentment.infonexus.com (resentment.infonexus.com [207.171.209.38]) by netspace.org (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id BAA01364 for <bugtraq@netspace.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 01:06:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 7022 invoked by uid 501); 14 Nov 1997 06:06:...

....8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA07416 for <BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG>; Sat, 18 Jul 1998 16:00:10 -0400 Received: from unknown@netspace.org (port 9824 [128.148.157.6]) by brimstone.netspace.org with ESMTP id <81164-2225>; Sat, 18 Jul 1998 16:02:16 -0400 Approved-By: aleph1@DFW.NET Received: from ANARCHY.MAXHO.COM (ANARCHY.MAXHO.COM [206.20.110.150]) by netspace.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA25501 for <bugtraq@netspace.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 23:26:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (twiztah@localhost) by ANARCHY.MAXHO.COM (8.9.0/8.8.7)...

Hi everyone, Thanks all for your feedback. Here is a reply to most of your comments.... Roger. Chris Evans wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > not to give those rights away. A non-setuid program should not have to > > worry about buffer overruns (you can crash the program, wow!). It > Just a reminder, that in some cases, it _should_ worry. As a

This was posted not too long ago on sci.crypt... Enjoy... I think the most relevant information is near the top, but it''s all quite good... :-) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- There is no intrinsic difference between algorithm and data, the same information can be viewed as data in one context and as algorithm in another. Why then do so many people claim that encryption algorithms

...(dufresne@parka.winternet.com [198.174.169.9]) by darkstar.sysinfo.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id SAA06621 for <dufresne@darkstar.sysinfo.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 18:51:10 -0600 Posted-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:31:02 -0600 (CST) Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:31:02 -0600 (CST) Approved-By: ALEPH1@UNDERGROUND.ORG X-Authentication-Warning: dilbert.kluge.net: felicity owned process doing -bs MIME-Version: 1.0 Approved-By: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@KLUGE.NET> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961126161126.13571C-100000@dilbert.kluge.net> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 16:14:48 -0500 Reply-To: Th...

We just had a security application vendor come in. We asked about Linux support and he said that putting a security application on top of an insecure OS was useless. When I asked what he meant by insecure he replied that Linux does not have a true Auditing capability - as opposed to HP-UX & Solaris which they do support. Can anyone explain to me what he was talking about? Thanks, Marty