search for: alefhgzf4x6x6mz3xdxjma

Since in Linux we are mostly a debian shop we''d like to stick with debian for our calculation nodes if possible. So I wanted to ask the lustre 2.2 instructions for Debian are they more or less relevant to lustre 2.4/2.5 or am I going headlong into a tall brick wall. Also are newer clients backwards compatible with older server software? I am currently just setting up a demo environment

...ong time to complete. For example chown on 200 MB folder is taking minutes. The MDS is not loaded at all. All other operations (file read and write) seem to be doing fine. Any help is greatly appreciated. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

...ROMSØ Norway. phone:+47 77 64 41 07, fax:+47 77 64 41 00 Roy Dragseth, Team Leader, High Performance Computing Direct call: +47 77 64 62 56. email: roy.dragseth-hYqmg196XYc@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

...rnel 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 Congratulations on finishing your Lustre installation! To register your copy of Lustre and find out more about Lustre Support, Service, and Training offerings please visit -Weilin _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

...o striping for the dirs containing the small files, max_dirty_mb=256, max_rpcs_in_flight=32, staahead=8192 and lnet.debug=0. Is it normal to get two times slower access times with the mounted loop device ?? _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

...up - Livermore Computing Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue, MS L-557 Livermore, CA 94551 v: (925) 423-2699 f: (925) 423-6961 E: richard-hedges-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

...quot;lquota" the only way or can we also use traditional Linux method of adding "usrquota" in /etc/fstab? If both methods can be used what are pros and cons of each method? Sincerely, Amjad _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

...d connected by Infiniband Mellanox HBAs. Running this in a VM with the MDT and a single OSS on one node in a VM using TCP did not exhibit this problem. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Michael _______________________________________________ Lustre-devel mailing list Lustre-devel-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel

...o for Lustre and not for the alternatives? what are the advantages for example with respect to Ceph? I''m looking forward to your replies. Thanks in advance! :) With kind regards, Tim van Elteren _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

...on suggested in the next mail, which did not work. Even links for ldiskfsprogs are not working to try. Do I need some other version of e2fsprogs? Can anyone throw light on this ? Thanks, Mandar Joshi _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

....29  MB/s  Max: 1800.98  MB/s [W] Avg: 1741.63  MB/s  Min: 1682.29  MB/s  Max: 1800.98  MB/s session is ended ./lnet-selftest.sh: line 17:  8835 Terminated              lst stat servers _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Hello Lustre Experts I am trying to solve a problem with very slow "ls" and other big amount of file operations but good overall read/write rates. We are running a small cluster of 3 OSSs with 9 OSTs, 1MDS (with SSD MDT) and currently two clients. All server nodes are centos 5.2 with lustre 1.8.1 while the clients are centos 5.4 with lustre 1.8.3. All components are networked with DDR

Hi, We run four-node Lustre 2.3, and I needed to both change hardware under MGS/MDS and reassign an OSS ip. Just the same, I added a brand new 10GE network to the system, which was the reason for MDS hardware change. I ran tunefs.lustre --writeconf as per chapter 14.4 in Lustre Manual, and everything mounts fine. Log regeneration apparently works, since it seems to do something, but

What is the process for integrating a Lustre+SAMFS solution into an existing customer environment. The plan is to have CRS build the Lustre component, but Lustre and SAMFS will need to configured and integrated into the customer computing environment. I am very familiar with the SAMFS integration, but not Lustre integration. Do we have resources in PS to provide the integration? Is this