search for: alecbenzer

You need to insert v into the basic block before the return. Note that %calltmp is absent from the dump of the function. The verifier is complaining because it found this pointer to %calltmp, but it didn't find the definition anywhere above its use. Reid On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:04 PM, alecbenzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com> wrote: > > This has been driving me crazy. In order to JIT stuff in a simple REPL I'm > trying to wrap them in anonymous functions and then evaluate them (as per > recommendation of the Kaleidoscope guide). > > With simple expressions it works f...

This has been driving me crazy. In order to JIT stuff in a simple REPL I'm trying to wrap them in anonymous functions and then evaluate them (as per recommendation of the Kaleidoscope guide). With simple expressions it works fine. Like if I try and add 4 and 5, I get this from the bare llvm::Value dump: double 9.000000e+00 and this after it's wrapped in a function: define double @0() {

Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com> writes: > Ok, so calling lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME instead of FUNCTIONNAME works (is there > any reason the post used the lle_X_ prefix other than convention? was it > once possible to call external functions as I was originally trying, or, why > did the blog post think it wa...

...at I was trying to do seems to be working how I expect it to. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article > that has been posted to gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel as well. > > Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com> writes: > > > Ok, so calling lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME instead of FUNCTIONNAME works (is there > > any reason the post used the lle_X_ prefix other than convention? was it > > once possible to call external functions as I was originally trying, or, > why > >...

I've been following this guide: http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html and am getting an error when trying to create an execution engine. When running this code: executionEngine = llvm::EngineBuilder(module).setErrorStr(&errStr).create(); errStr contains: "Interpreter has not been linked in." I'm using this command to build: g++ -g errors.o lexer.o parser.o lang.o

...; > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> > Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 01:34 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] "UNREACHABLE executed!" error? > To: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Cc: Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > > Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> >> Hello >> >>> I just noticed that my union seems to look like an array....is that actually >>> a union or do I have a problem somewhere? >> >> Yes. Unions are...

...guments however. printing args.size() from the function yields 12105250188025543488. The generated call to it looks like: %object_tmp = call %object_structure* @lle_X_create_number_object(double 5.000000e+00) ; <%object_structure*> [#uses=1] On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com> wrote: > The blog post I linked to implied that adding a symbol in the form > lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME would allow you to call a function called FUNCTIONNAME. > Is this not the case? > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:46 PM, <o.j.sivart at gmail.com> wrote: > &gt...

The blog post I linked to implied that adding a symbol in the form lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME would allow you to call a function called FUNCTIONNAME. Is this not the case? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:46 PM, <o.j.sivart at gmail.com> wrote: > You are adding the symbol as "lle_X_create_number_object" yet your error > message implies you have tried to lookup and use

The dump from the function I'm running: define %object_structure @0() { entry: ret %object_structure { i8 0, %object_union [double 5.000000e+00, double false] } } the only output I get after the runFunction() call is: UNREACHABLE executed! Stack dump: 0. Running pass 'X86 DAG->DAG Instruction Selection' on function '@0' I just noticed that my union seems to look like

...---- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> >> Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 01:34 >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] "UNREACHABLE executed!" error? >> To: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> >> Cc: Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> >> >> Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >>> >>> Hello >>> >>>> I just noticed that my union seems to look like an array....is that actually >>>> a union or do I have a problem somewhere? >&gt...

This isn't a strictly llvm-related problem, but I thought I'd ask anyway to see if anyone can help. I'm trying to write a dynamically typed language on top of llvm. My initial idea was to have a general object type for all objects in my language. I came up with: { i8, i8* } the first element of the structure would hold the type of the object, and the second is a pointer to the

What does this error mean? I'm getting it from an ExecutionEngine::runFunction() call. The function I'm passing it was run through verifyFunction() right before the runFunction() call. I can't seem to find anything that tells me what causes this, only specific (but seemingly unrelated to my problem) cases of it happening. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Is there documentation somewhere on how to call external functions from llvm? The only guide I found was this: http://www.gearleaf.com/blog/post/44, and it doesn't seem to be working for me. I have a function: llvm::GenericValue lle_X_create_number_object(llvm::FunctionType* ft, const std::vector<llvm::GenericValue>& args) { llvm_object_structure* result = new

Tthe IRBuilder APIs for unions or unions in general? Either way, I was using unions as a temporary solution for a problem I was too lazy to fully figure out anyway. On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Alec Benzer wrote: > >> The dump from the function I'm running: >> >> define %object_structure @0() { >> entry: