search for: albait

...- 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64 I've read in the docu (which appears to be somewhat out of date) that one cannot generate binaries on win32 systems. The thing I don't understand is why I cannot generate assembly that is compatible with gcc (albait the cygwin version of gcc, but certainly cygwin gcc reads the same mnemonics as the unix version??). I've tryed several llc switches to produce compatible output but failed. Alex Chris Lattner schrieb: > > On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:31 AM, herz wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I...

...above > x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64 > > > I've read in the docu (which appears to be somewhat out of date) that > one cannot generate binaries on win32 systems. > The thing I don't understand is why I cannot generate assembly that is > compatible with gcc (albait the cygwin version of gcc, but > certainly cygwin gcc reads the same mnemonics as the unix version??). > I've tryed several llc switches to produce compatible output but failed. > > Alex > > Chris Lattner schrieb: >> >> On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:31 AM, herz wrote: &...

On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:31 AM, herz wrote: > Hi, > > I've generated a .bc file for a simple program using the clang front > end, the human readable output of llvm-dis looks good. > Running llc on the bc file generates an assembly file (.s using either > att or intel syntax). > Now, when I try to generate an executable with gcc (3.4.4 cygwin) I > get > lot's of

...64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64 >> >> >> I've read in the docu (which appears to be somewhat out of date) that >> one cannot generate binaries on win32 systems. >> The thing I don't understand is why I cannot generate assembly that is >> compatible with gcc (albait the cygwin version of gcc, but >> certainly cygwin gcc reads the same mnemonics as the unix version??). >> I've tryed several llc switches to produce compatible output but failed. >> >> Alex >> >> Chris Lattner schrieb: >> >>> On Jan 26, 2...

Hi, I've generated a .bc file for a simple program using the clang front end, the human readable output of llvm-dis looks good. Running llc on the bc file generates an assembly file (.s using either att or intel syntax). Now, when I try to generate an executable with gcc (3.4.4 cygwin) I get lot's of errors: $ gcc t.S t.S: Assembler messages: t.S:4: Error: no such instruction: `align