search for: alanhogan

...Markdown-Discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: `time` element syntax (Alan Hogan) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:45:38 -0700 > From: Alan Hogan <alanhogan at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: `time` element syntax > To: "Discussion related to Markdown." > <markdown-discuss at six.pairlist.net> > Message-ID: <3C9ED2364EBC41B298B63E21787D3F1B at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >...

While I empathize with your predicament, I generally prefer not to have expletives in my inbox. Also, what has this to do with markdown? On Jul 5, 2013 7:20 PM, "bowerbird" <bowerbird at aol.com> wrote: > fan_fucking_tastic. > > somebody hit another one of the dead skunks on this road. > > -bowerbird > > _______________________________________________ >

i am considering writing converters between my "zen markup language' and "markdown", but i don't know which version of markdown to target. i'd think it'd be the "pandoc" version, and i understand that to be closest to "multimarkdown", but gruber has said he "disagrees" with "almost every part" of multimarkdown's syntax

Esteemed human authors and robotic parse-bots: I recently discovered that most or all Markdown implementations, including Gruber?s original in Perl, have an odd behavior with regards to lists that follow each other. Namely, a bulleted list followed by a numbered list, or vice-versa, is masked as if it were part of the first list (and of the first list?s type.) For example, consider the following

let's talk about writing tools that use markdown (or more broadly, another form of light-markup)... to begin with, there is the markdown "dingus"... from a demo perspective, it has been _fantastic_. it has provided interested observers a quick idea about the simplicity and the power of markdown. as a writing tool, it's a bit clunky; it will work, yes, but i'd doubt many