search for: aktas

...on '3065acdf-92ffb5c4 at 10.10.1.50' of Response 101: Match Found Apr 4 17:49:14 DEBUG[6161] chan_sip.c: Setting NAT on RTP to 524288 Apr 4 17:49:14 DEBUG[6161] chan_sip.c: Checking SIP call limits for device 5002 Apr 4 17:49:14 DEBUG[6161] chan_sip.c: build_route: Contact hop: "Cem Aktas" <sip:3549 at 10.10.1.50:5060> Apr 4 17:49:14 DEBUG[6153] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/5002-09195d70' Apr 4 17:49:14 DEBUG[6271] app_macro.c: Executed application: Set Apr 4 17:49:14 DEBUG[6271] app_macro.c: Executed application: Set Apr 4 17:49:14 DEBUG[6271...

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:24:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Can we get some more words -- preferably in actual code comments, on > when exactly #VC happens? Sure, will add this as a comment before the actual runtime VC handler. > Because the only thing I remember is that #VC could happen on any memop, > but I also have vague memories of that being a later extention. Currently

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:24:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Can we get some more words -- preferably in actual code comments, on > when exactly #VC happens? Sure, will add this as a comment before the actual runtime VC handler. > Because the only thing I remember is that #VC could happen on any memop, > but I also have vague memories of that being a later extention. Currently

Hi, On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 06:09:19PM -0700, Erdem Aktas wrote: > It looks like there is an expectation that the bootloader will start > from the 64bit entry point in header_64.S. With the current patch > series, it will not boot up if the bootloader jumps to the startup_32 > entry, which might break some default distro images. > What are...

Hi Erdem, On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:48:51AM -0700, Erdem Aktas wrote: > Yes, I am using OVMF with SEV-ES (sev-es-v12 patches applied). I am > running Ubuntu 18.04 distro. My grub target is x86_64-efi. I also > tried installing the grub-efi-amd64 package. In all cases, the grub is > running in 64bit but enters the startup_32 in 32 bit mode. I think...

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:54:40AM -0700, Erdem Aktas wrote: > I am using a custom, optimized and stripped down version, OVMF build. > Do you think it is because of the OVMF or grub? Not sure, I havn't looked into how grub decides which entry point to use. > In my case, there are 2 places where the CPUID is called: the first > one is...