search for: akbal

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "akbal".

Did you mean: akbar
2005 Jul 01
10
Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
...nbind without using Kerberos. After installing the Update to our AD-Servers. It seems that winbind lost its connectivity. wbinfo -t worked. wbinfo -u showed errors. After removing the update from all our servers, winbind works again. Should I move our configuration to kerberos ? Thanks. Oktay Akbal
2005 Jul 16
2
after upgrade from 3.0.7 -> 3.0.14 extrem slow access from window s 2000
Hello list, a samba server serves the home directories for about 100 Windows 2000 clients. We had samba 3.0.7 (on debian woody) installed, and upgraded to 3.0.14a (we used the sernet packages on debian sarge). Now access to files from windows 2000 clients is extremely slow, especially on .exe files. Simply selecting a exe file from windows explorer may freeze it for 2-10 seconds. Other file
2003 Feb 12
2
Samba server in a failover environment
Hello, Samba Gurus ..... I have a Samba server running on a pair of SUN servers (server-a and server-b). The samba shares are NFS mounted from a third SUN server (server-c). I installed Samba 2.2.7a on the paired SUN servers under /usr/local/samba (Samba 2.2.7a is locally installed on server-a and server-b, since /usr/local/samba is local on the rootdisk.) The failover environment works like
2016 Apr 15
3
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
> On 15/04/16 10:33, Oktay Akbal wrote: > > [global] > > workgroup = DOMAIN > > realm = DOMAIN.DE > > netbios name = HOST > > server string = HOST > > security = ADS > > encrypt passwords = Yes > > map to guest = Bad User...
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
On 15/04/16 11:11, Oktay Akbal wrote: >> On 15/04/16 10:33, Oktay Akbal wrote: >>> [global] >>> workgroup = DOMAIN >>> realm = DOMAIN.DE >>> netbios name = HOST >>> server string = HOST >>> security = ADS >>>...
2003 Feb 13
1
AW: Samba server in a failover environment
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Oktay Akbal wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Hsu, Cheng (Consultant) wrote: > > > But my experiment shows that I MUST > explicitly join the > > NT domain > > in order for everything to work. > > Just a guess: Make sure that the server do not only have the same > smb.conf, bu...
2016 Apr 15
3
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
Hello everyone,   any ideas on why a newly installed domain member (w2k8 domain) might seem to work fine in every test (wbinfo -g, wbinfo -t, getent group, wbinfo -n username, getent passwd user, share-access.., ) but only enumeration of users with wbinfo -u and getent passwd fail? wbinfo -u just returns without any output and getent passwd just shows the default centos7 users.   Even with
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
On 15/04/16 10:33, Oktay Akbal wrote: > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > realm = DOMAIN.DE > netbios name = HOST > server string = HOST > security = ADS > encrypt passwords = Yes > map to guest = Bad User > password server = * >...
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
On 15/04/16 12:05, Oktay Akbal wrote: >>> I don't see where exactly the ways differ. I already played with idmap settings and keytab. It makes no difference. >>> BTW the wiki entry does not explain how to create the keytab, so the setting is not really useful if you just follow that page. >> With the...
2016 Apr 18
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2)
On 18/04/16 08:06, Oktay Akbal wrote: > >>> Rowland >>> >> OK, it is now later :-) >> >> My DCs are now running a self-compiled Samba 4.4.2, I set up a domain >> member in a VM running 4.4.2, again self compiled. My laptop runs Wheezy >> and Samba Version 4.2.11-SerNet-Debian-9....
2016 Apr 18
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2)
...sh template homedir = /home/%U -----Message d'origine----- De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de Rowland penny Envoyé : lundi 18 avril 2016 09:36 À : sambalist Objet : Re: [Samba] Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2) On 18/04/16 08:06, Oktay Akbal wrote: > >>> Rowland >>> >> OK, it is now later :-) >> >> My DCs are now running a self-compiled Samba 4.4.2, I set up a domain >> member in a VM running 4.4.2, again self compiled. My laptop runs Wheezy >> and Samba Version 4.2.11-SerNet-Debian-9....
2003 Feb 21
1
PATCH: downloading drivers from Solaris [was Re: So SAMBA no longer ...]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Robert M. Martel wrote: > I've followed the steps as listed in the manual. Log onto a > windows 2000 client as a user listed as a printer admin. Load the > printer driver and make the changes to reflect installed options on the > printer. Just as listed in section 6.2.2 of the "how-to" manual >
2016 Apr 16
7
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2)
On 16/04/16 21:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > New update. > > > > I now have done about 6 machines. > > 2 with samba 4.2.10 work fine, 2 not. > > 1 with samba 4.3.7 works fine, 1 not. > > > > I saw Jelmer updated the samba to 4.3.8 in sid, so i recompiled these to jessie. > > I upgraded the 4.3.7 to 4.3.8 Hi Louis, debian 4.2.10 is the same as
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
...e = .... > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland penny > Verzonden: vrijdag 15 april 2016 13:50 > Aan: sambalist > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not > > On 15/04/16 12:05, Oktay Akbal wrote: > >>> I don't see where exactly the ways differ. I already played with idmap > settings and keytab. It makes no difference. > >>> BTW the wiki entry does not explain how to create the keytab, so the > setting is not really useful if you just follow that page...
2016 Apr 15
5
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
> > I don't see where exactly the ways differ. I already played with idmap settings and keytab. It makes no difference. > > BTW the wiki entry does not explain how to create the keytab, so the setting is not really useful if you just follow that page. > > With the 'old system' you just have one range, this is now depreciated > and you should use the new