Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "aixc".
Did you mean:
aix
2011 Nov 10
0
AIX + ACLs - Unsupported attribute value (124)
...vison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, no IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, no symtimes
/tmp/rtest$ aclget ./a/file
*
* ACL_type AIXC
*
attributes:
base permissions
owner(ebambach): rw-
group(staff): r--
others: r--
extended permissions
enabled
permit rwx u:myuser
/tmp/rtest$ aclget ./b/file
*
* ACL_type AIXC
*
attributes:
base permissions
owner(ebambach): rw-
group(staff): r--
others:...
2012 Jan 05
1
[Bug 8690] New: Simple ACLs abort with "Unsupported attribute value (124)"
...vison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, no IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, no symtimes
/tmp/rtest$ aclget ./a/file
*
* ACL_type AIXC
*
attributes:
base permissions
owner(ebambach): rw-
group(staff): r--
others: r--
extended permissions
enabled
permit rwx u:myuser
/tmp/rtest$ aclget ./b/file
*
* ACL_type AIXC
*
attributes:
base permissions
owner(ebambach): rw-
group(staff): r--
others:...
2006 Apr 26
0
Many msgs log.winbindd about "group xxxxx in domain yyyyy does not exist"
...ine what this is complaining about?
One area I do not understand is why it is complaining about AIXSAMBA (the NETBIOS name).
There is an entry in /etc/group for the "system" group (GID = 0).
I do have some directories in one of the samba shares with an acl set as follows:
*
* ACL_type AIXC
*
attributes:
base permissions
owner(root): rwx
group(win_domain_users): rwx
others: r-x
extended permissions
enabled
permit rwx g:system
Environment:
AIX 5.3: long names enabled (31 char including ending zero), using pam for authentication
Samba 3.0.22 (compiled from...
2008 Dec 02
8
RELENG_7_1: bce driver change generating too much interrupts ?
Since last upgrade, I see much more CPU time "eated" by interrupts (at
least 10% cpu in top)
(see http://dgeo.perso.ec-marseille.fr/cpu-week.png)
The server behave correctly (Or seems to?), and high interrupt number
seems to come from bce cards (source: systat -vmstat)
I just upgraded from
"RELENG_7 Mon Sep 8 12:33:06 CEST 2008"
to
"RELENG_7_1 Sat Nov 29 16:20:35 CET