search for: aias

It has been my experience that only the owner of the file and root change change ACLS on that file. Since you've stated that Administrator IS the owner, maybe there's something else. Are you getting any errors ? Who is the owner of the diretory that the folder resides in. Is the Administrator given write permissions at the share level? My work-around for modifying ACL's was to

How to manage my Samba ACLs from NT ? My administrator seemingly doesn't have the rights to change ACLs (ownership). And even though my administrator owns the fiels on the Samba machine it has no rights to change ACLs or ownership. The files are owned by "DOMAIN+Administrator" and group is "DOMAIN+Domain Admins". I have added the user to smbpasswd I think (how can I check

I have a Win 7 machine which accesses a Samba NT4 Domain. That machine has been used by a single user for a couple of years. I need to change the user. I find I can log in using the old users name and password, but if I try to login using the new users name and password I get an error message that there are no login servers. Sometimes I get an error message that there is not trust

I may have a clue. I have two servers running Samba 3.2.3, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both. On the Member Server when I access the [Projects] share everything works as expected. When I access the [Windows] share I get prompted for a user name and password but no combination

I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting. I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both. I have two shares on the member server and as far as I can tell they are identical. [Projects] works as expected but [Windows] always asks

Hi, I am wondering about the meaning of the cmake flags LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX and LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXXABI. Are they used to indicate that if the C/C++ compiler for building LLVM is clang, and if this clang has support for libc++ with libc++Abi, that both lib++ and libc++abi should be used (instead of linking to the default, which at least on Linux is libstdc++)? If not, what is the canonical way of

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2254 Bug ID: 2254 Summary: Better error message for globs that have too many results. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sftp

Hi Michael, I am wondering about the meaning of the cmake flags LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX and > LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXXABI. Are they used to indicate that if the C/C++ compiler > for building LLVM is clang, and if this clang has support for libc++ with > libc++Abi, that both lib++ and libc++abi should be used (instead of linking > to the default, which at least on Linux is libstdc++)? Yes that

I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both. I am don't understand the results. As far as I can tell I have everything configured as it should be. The basic globals for the DC [global] workgroup = ATLANTA time server = Yes

I have had a long term problem with my set up. winbind authentication is erratic. Whenever I restart one of my servers the member server refuses to authenticate users. Sometimes is will only authenticate some users on some shares. Usually by fiddling with it I can eventually get it to work but I can't identify the solution so I can replicate it. Once I get can finally get it to work it

I have a problem with accessing two share. Sigma works as expected one Windows always asks for a login name even though their smb.conf entries are the same; I even tried adding public to the Windows share with no success. [Sigma] Comment = Sigma Design Data path = /files/Lucretia/Sigma writeable = yes browseable = yes create mask = 0764 directory

I'm running out of things to check. I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both. On the Member Server when I access the [Projects] share everything works as expected. When I access the [Windows] share I get prompted for a user name and password

Hi folks, In our scientific simulation tool, we set up our build system to link against LLVMSupport to print stack traces for debugging purposes, also from other compilers. This works very well on most hosts, but we fail to make it work with gcc on a Cray XC 40 cluster. They have a very restrictive toolchain setup (everything is controlled by the “module” command; you never get to see any real

I just upgraded my Member Server to 3.2.4 on Ubuntu. I have a permissions problem. Users can create files on the Samba shares but they cannot delete files. Here is a typical share definition. [Testing] comment = Test for Samba path = /files/test browseable = yes writeable = yes create mask = 0764 directory mask = 0775 On the Linux side I can do

Also please note that there is a description of each option in the CMakeLists.txt :) llvm/trunk/CMakeLists.txt option(LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES "Compile with C++ modules enabled." OFF) option(LLVM_ENABLE_CXX1Y "Compile with C++1y enabled." OFF) option(LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX "Use libc++ if available." OFF) option(LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXXABI "Use libc++abi when using

We have a Windows Domain NT. We are setting up four samba Servers, two new and 2 legacy servers. The new server are Ubuntu AMD64 Linux with Samba 3.0.22 One of these is the PDC. The legacy Servers are Solaris 8 running Samba 3.0.24. We are using winbindd and local tdb files on the PDC for authentication. We plan to migrate to LDAP latter. I have used SWAT to configure each server. I have

OK I'm back on this after a tour through firewalld and other issues. I see Louis has posted his how to on git-hub. It seems very helpful I also see his method uses the Ubuntu resolver but also uses bind9 so I'm not sure whether his method can be adapted to using the internal DNS in Samba. In setting this up one of my main goals is to limit the amount of customization I do as I have

...n = pool.luh-tfd.local } LUH-TFD.LOCAL = { kdc = winad1.tfd.uni-hannover.de:88 admin_server = winad1.tfd.uni-hannover.de:749 default_domain = luh-tfd.local } WINPOOL.TFD.UNI-HANNOVER.DE = { kdc = aias.winpool.tfd.uni-hannover.de:88 admin_server = aias.winpool.tfd.uni-hannover.de:749 default_domain = winpool.tfd.uni-hannover.de } [domain_realm] .luh-tfd.local = LUH-TFD.LOCAL luh-tfd.local = LUH-TFD.LOCAL .winpool.tfd.uni-hanno...

Hi, I have two tables: > iso continent code code3 codenum country 1 EU AD AND 20 Andorra, Principality of 2 AS AE ARE 784 United Arab Emirates 3 AS AF AFG 4 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 4 NA AG ATG 28 Antigua and Barbuda 5 NA AI AIA 660

I have two servers running Samba, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10 and running smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end. I am having a problem understanding ID mapping. The mapping is not the same on both machines. On the Domain Controller > root at thelma:/etc/init.d# wbinfo -i 'ATLANTA\rob' > rob:*:1000:2003:Robert