search for: ahrs

Hi, Just a quick question. I am looking for a replacement for the command "cp -al" which has problems dealing with a massive amount of files (http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-12/msg00028.html). Could I use "rsync -aHr" to do _exactly_ the same thing as "cp -al"? I just want to make sure before trying it. Thanks for your help. Charles --

I am trying to call a FORTRAN subroutine from R. is.loaded is turning out to be TRUE. However when I run my .Fortran command I get the following error: Error in .Fortran("VALUEAHROPTIMIZE", as.double(ahrArray), as.double(kwArray), : Fortran symbol name "valueahroptimize" not in load table I have given the FORTRAN declaration below: subroutine VALUEAHROPTIMIZE(AHR,

Hi, Using a samba 4, and having users configured as primary group domain users (513) we detected that then if you execute net group /domain "Domain Users" then user is not showed in as member of domain users, if you remove from primary group and assign another group then with net group /domain "Domain Users" you can list this user as member. This generates that for example

I am trying to call a FORTRAN subroutine from R. is.loaded is turning out to be TRUE. However when I run my .Fortran command I get the following error: Error in .Fortran("VALUEAHROPTIMIZE", as.double(ahrArray), as.double(kwArray), : Fortran symbol name "valueahroptimize" not in load table I have given the FORTRAN declaration below: subroutine VALUEAHROPTIMIZE(AHR,

...s, we're trying to keep the backups of identical files on different systems linked to each other. So, on -read-batch, rsync has one more argument to the one generated on the sending end, it is one extra --link-dest. Original command generates the following batch.sh file (simplified): rsync -aHRS --read-batch=rbatch --link-dest=e/ n/ the actual command being run is: rsync -aHRS --read-batch=rbatch --link-dest=e/ --link-dest=../common/ n/ without this extra --link-dest, it all works fine. The problem appears to be some inconsistency between the two parts of the code - one which decides...

Hi, If you try net group /domain "Domain Users" in samba domain with domain users as primary group any user is showed, but If you try the same in a native AD then users are listed, try this to reproduce the error Thanks 2018-02-12 20:24 GMT+01:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>: > Hi Rowland, > > Not really sure if that is correct, tried with native AD and domain

Not possible, I do not have a Windows AD DC, but I don't doubt it works, probably because windows has a similar work around to 'samba-tool group listmembers Domain\ Users' --> Correct this command returns correctly the users Can you create a file on the netapp that ends up belonging to 'username:Domain Users' ? --> Correct fiel created without issues Does 'getent

Hi Rowland, Not really sure if that is correct, tried with native AD and domain users are showed also if they have domain users as primary group, IT seems a samba bug liek It was described here https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-October/211699.html Any suggestion about how to solve, other groups are working OK, but seems that with netapp cdot domain users are not usable, and this is a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=919 Summary: ah: --reserver is not supported (ipv4 and ipv6) Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org

Is not a permission issue, because if you replace primary group then works, It seems a bug related with priamry group and domain users, then not listed and permission not applied because is not working, tried with native AD windows 2008 and then error not reproduced net group /domain "Domain users" lists correctly users also if they have doamin users as primary groups Thanks 2018-02-12

Hi, additional information, creating a new file or folder with full permission to domain user both are not usable (permission denied), then if you add permission at level user then works, It seems that issue is only with domain users as primary group Thanks 2018-02-12 21:21 GMT+01:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>: > Not possible, I do not have a Windows AD DC, but I don't

...ink-dest argument on the receiving end, to simplify finding identical files. So the receiving end, unlike the sending one, has two --link-dests -- one usual for the "previous state", and one extra, for "other machine" current state. Example command lines: sender: rsync -aHRSx \ --link-dest=$last \ --write-batch=batch \ directory... \ $cur receiver: rsync -aHRS \ --read-batch=batch \ --link-dest=$other \ --link-dest=$last \ $cur So the only one additional option is given: extra --link-dest=$other, for current backup dir of another...

Hello, New here, and I''m not sure if this is the correct mailing list to post this question or not. Anyway, we are having some questions about multi-protocol (CIFS/NFS) access to the same files specifically when not using AD or LDAP. Summary: Accessing the same folder from CIFS or NFS when working in a workgroup configuration (no domain authentication) works fine using cifs user

Dear all, Here is my code which am using to combine 5th column from different data sets. Here is the function to do my job genesymbol.append.file <-NULL gene.column <- NULL readGeneSymbol <- function(files,genesymbol.column=5){ for(i in fnames){ temp <- read.table(fnames,header=T,sep="\t",stringsAsFactors=F,quote="\"")

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++