search for: aggsortkey

Hi Bryan, > Does that sit well with everyone? Seems fine to me. Just revisiting one of Dragan''s points, though (sorry if I missed the answer) - is there a reason for making this global (via a #pragma) rather than, say, simply providing two functions which print in the different orders? e.g. printa() for sort by sample, printak() for sort by key. My reason for wanting to do both in

Howdy, Is there a method to get the number of elements in an aggregation? Are the results stored in an aggregation guaranteed to be in any type of order? Thanks for any insight, - Ryan -- UNIX Administrator http://daemons.net/~matty

Hello dtrace-discuss, Sometimes I want to run a script for some time and every n second output N top entries. trunc() isn''t suitable here as it also removed keys/values. I want it ''coz over time if I use sum() entries which are normally truncated can actually get to top over a time. Maybe printa() extension, something like: printa(@b[10]) - to output top 10? --

Hi, there was discussion on "truncating aggregation output only" (http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=19008) on DTrace forum. From what was discussed the aggregation options like aggsortrev, aggsortkey, aggsortpos, aggsortkeypos are already available (Thanks Bryan!). I am wondering what are current plans for ''aggtop'' option (or ''truncating aggregation output'' functionality in general)? thanks a lot, -katya

Hi All, I used the following script from the dtrace manual to measure how long a particular process runs on the cpu. Modified it to look at the exact timestamps: [i] sched:::on-cpu { self->ts = timestamp; printf("on=%d\n", self->ts) } sched:::off-cpu /self->ts/ { printf("off=%d\n", timestamp) self->ts = 0; } [/i] The output looks like this: [i]on=24591 off=24603