search for: aggrippino

...8 wine.inf vince 11529 11226 0 00:08 pts/1 00:00:00 /usr/lib/../bin/wine-pthread winecfg.exe - If I use strace -p 11549, in this case, the system call it's hung on is "recv(12, ". I don't know if this is helpful at all. Thanks to anyone who can help. -- Vince Aggrippino -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20060505/292fbfd1/attachment.htm

...rg today ----- Client: Microsoft Windows XP Professional, Service Pack 2 Firewall disabled Workgroup name: HOME ----- smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2005/08/08 14:03:44 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = HOME server string = home.aggrippino.com security = SHARE guest account = testsmb username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log hosts allow = 192.168.1. [tmp] comment = temporary files path = /tmp guest ok = Yes [homes] read only = No guest ok = Yes ----- I created a new...

Is this bug 5057? ... I've just installed the latest version of wine from CVS and created a new .wine directory. Upon running winecfg, there are no letters on any of the buttons or tabs. After reading the text of bug 5057, I checked .wine/drive_c/windows/fonts and there are no files. I copied and pasted all of the font files from the equivalent location in one of my backups to this

...ibsmb/ntlm_check.c:ntlm_password_check(326) ntlm_password_check: Checking NT MD4 password [2005/11/17 11:37:29, 3] libsmb/ntlm_check.c:ntlm_password_check(344) ntlm_password_check: NT MD4 password check failed for user vince Does anyone know the solution to this problem? Thank you, Vince Aggrippino vaggrippino@gmail.com

I've tried "wins support = true" (and "wins support = yes"... just in case). I stopped and restarted the samba daemons and rebooted the WinXP client. I have no change in the results. Based on something I read in the troubleshooting part of the HowTo, I added the address of the server to the Wins tab in the advanced section of the TCP/IP properties... still no results :(