Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "aggregatecopy".
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
.../Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-08-20-EnumSizeProblem
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-09-29-NonPODsByValue
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto
SingleSource/Regression/C/2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift
SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2011-03-28-Bitfield
SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx
Singl...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...Regression/C/2004-08-12-InlinerAndAllocas | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-13-Crasher | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-expr_stmt |...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers | 0.0021 620 0.0021 * 0.0021 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy | 0.0018 540 0.0020 * 0.0019 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto | 0.0035 840 0.0047 * 0.0046 |...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers | 0.0040 620 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy | 0.0040 540 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto | 0.0080 824 0.0040 * 0.0040 |...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers | 0.0026 616 0.0017 * 0.0017 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy | 0.0016 532 0.0015 * 0.0067 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto | 0.0036 836 0.0041 * 0.0040 |...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers | 0.0008 652 0.0011 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy | 0.0007 564 0.0010 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto | 0.0014 880 0.0022 * 0.0023 |...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...| - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers |
> 0.0000 664 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.01
> 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy |
> 0.0000 588 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto |
> 0.0000 860 0.0100 * 0....
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-
> GlobalVarInitializers | 0.0000 664 0.0000
> * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 *
> 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-
> AggregateCopy | 0.0000 588 0.0000
> * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-
> IndirectGoto | 0.0000 860 0.0100
> *...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...NonPODsByValue.ll 4 5850 0 0.01 5834 0 0.01 5834
2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers.ll 1 2336 0 0.01 2324 0 0.01 2324
2003-10-13-SwitchTest.ll 1 2458 0 0.01 2449 0 0.01 2449
2003-10-29-ScalarReplBug.ll 3 3638 0 0.01 3629 0 0.01 3629
2004-02-02-NegativeZero.ll 2 2157 0 0.01 2148 0 0.01 2148
2004-02-03-AggregateCopy.ll 1 2672 0 0.01 2660 0 0.01 2660
2004-03-15-IndirectGoto.ll 1 3331 0 0.01 3319 0 0.01 3319
2004-06-20-StaticBitfieldInit.ll 1 1868 0 0.01 1859 0 0.01 1859
2004-08-12-InlinerAndAllocas.ll 2 4031 0 0.01 4019 0 0.01 4019
2004-11-28-GlobalBoolLayout.ll 1 3428 0 0.01 3419 0 0.01 3419
2005-05-06-LongLon...