search for: aggreagte

...'x' and 'w' must have the same length Apparently the grouping does not work on the additional argument. I am using weighted mean here just to be explicit and avoid supplying a custom function gor weighted MAD, which is not difficult to write by itself. It's making it work with aggreagte that is the problem. > aggregate function (x, ...) UseMethod("aggregate") <environment: namespace:stats> Does not show anything... Stephen B

...2q 2vcpu: 451kpps +70% 3q 3vcpu: 661kpps +150% 4q 4vcpu: 941kpps +250% Netperf Local VM to VM test: - VM1 and its vcpu/vhost thread in numa node 0 - VM2 and its vcpu/vhost thread in numa node 1 - a script is used to lauch the netperf with demo mode and do the postprocessing to measure the aggreagte result with the help of timestamp - average of 3 runs TCP_RR: size/session/+lat%/+normalize% 1/ 1/ 0%/ 0% 1/ 10/ +52%/ +6% 1/ 20/ +27%/ +5% 64/ 1/ 0%/ 0% 64/ 10/ +45%/ +4% 64/ 20/ +28%/ +7% 256/ 1/ -1%/ 0% 256/ 10/ +...

...2q 2vcpu: 451kpps +70% 3q 3vcpu: 661kpps +150% 4q 4vcpu: 941kpps +250% Netperf Local VM to VM test: - VM1 and its vcpu/vhost thread in numa node 0 - VM2 and its vcpu/vhost thread in numa node 1 - a script is used to lauch the netperf with demo mode and do the postprocessing to measure the aggreagte result with the help of timestamp - average of 3 runs TCP_RR: size/session/+lat%/+normalize% 1/ 1/ 0%/ 0% 1/ 10/ +52%/ +6% 1/ 20/ +27%/ +5% 64/ 1/ 0%/ 0% 64/ 10/ +45%/ +4% 64/ 20/ +28%/ +7% 256/ 1/ -1%/ 0% 256/ 10/ +...

...and b) the offset ranges overlap. No need to traverse through any union members. Similarly, in MDNode::getMostGenericTBAA() we do not consider nodes that represent union-enclosed types. This means the most generic type may be an aggregate or a union, in which case we return null node unless aggreagte accesses are supported. To distinct unions from other types we can have a special group for them. Alternatively, we can use type identification nodes, see below. For aggregate accesses: The comment in TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp suggests: // TODO: We need to check if AccessType of TagA encl...

> > > > For two given access sequences we can determine if the accessed > objects are allowed to overlap by the rules of the input > language. Sadly, this is where this becomes "unlikely to want to use to replace TBAA", at least for me. It may still be a thing we want anyway. This scheme is really an encoding of C/C++ TBAA info so it can be read by LLVM and requires