search for: afy

Hi list: I have been trying to get my feet wet with the ARM backend. As a warmup exercise I wanted to be able to move jumptables especially large ones out of the code section. Currently the idiom for jump tables loooks like this // .set PCRELV0, (.LJTI9_0_0-(.LPCRELL0+8)) // .LPCRELL0: // add r3, pc, #PCRELV0 // ldr pc, [r3, +r0, lsl #2] // .LJTI9_0_0: //

Hello LLVMDev, I've encountered what looks like a bug in LLVM 2.9, it doesn't appear to be fixed in 3.0 either. The problem occurs in function ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan. There's a circular dependency in setting the variable BigStack and AFI->setHashStackFrame(true). The expression which initializes BigStack calls estimateRSSStackSizeLimit which in

I am relatively new to R, but am intrigued by its flexibility. I am interested in quantile regression and quantile estimation as regards to cotton fiber length distributions. The length distribution affects spinning and weaving properties, so it is desirable to select for certain distribution types. The AFIS fiber testing machinery outputs a vector for each sample of type c(12, 235, 355, . . .

Hi Alok, Echoing Anton's statements, please provide a testcase! :) Apart from that, looking at your patch and description I actually think that it is estimateRSStackSizeLimit that is wrong. It is performing a check for a Thumb2 addressing mode whether the target has a FP register. That's the main check - for some reason it is appending another check AFI->hasStackFrame() which seems

Buenas, ¿Alguien ha hecho algun curso sobre bigdata que merezca la pena? La verdad es quequiero adquirir competencias sobre el manejo de grandes volumenes de información, hadoop, spark, etc y no se muy bien que estudios cursar. He estado mirando, pero veo que las escuelas de negocio lo orientan a big data + business analytics y no se si pueden pasar muy por encim adel tema o estar centrados en la

Hello, find enclosed a first patch for adding tail call optimizations for thumb1 targets. I assume that this list is the right place for publishing patches for review? Since this is my first proposal for LLVM, I'd very much appreciate your feedback. What the patch is meant to do: For Tail calls identified during DAG generation, the target address will be loaded into a register by use

Hi: This is my first patch submission. Hopefully, this is the proper the protocol. Attached is a patch for the llc ARM backend: Added mechanism to generate switch table in a data section rather than having it interleaved with the code. This is controlled by command line flags and off by default. Also, tried to document and improve the code where I modified it. Robert -------------- next part

To recap, this is what I was trying to solve: This C code: int bar(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f); int foo(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e ) { int x = 3*a; return bar3(a,b,c,d,e,x); } Produced the following assembly output: foo: push {r11, lr} sub sp, #8 bl bar add sp, #8 pop {r11, pc} The part I didn't like is that push/pop become

Hello Alok, > I fixed this by performing the CanEliminateFrame and > RegInfo->cannotEliminateFrame checks before the call to > estimateRSSStackSizeLimit, since these values are available before BigStack > is initialized. Does that sound reasonable? I’ve attached a patch with my > change. Will you please provide a testcase which reproduces the problem? Thanks! -- With best

On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:42 PM, robert muth wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> > wrote: >> >> On Jun 7, 2009, at 6:59 AM, robert muth wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Evan Cheng<evan.cheng at apple.com> >>> wrote: >>>> +cl::opt<std::string>

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2009, at 6:59 AM, robert muth wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Evan Cheng<evan.cheng at apple.com> >> wrote: >>> +cl::opt<std::string> FlagJumpTableSection("jumptable-section", >>> +                                          

Evan: Sorry for the late follow up, I was out of town last week. Enclosed please find the updated patch including all your suggestions and a dejagnus test. Robert On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:42 PM, robert muth wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com>

...7696 zcmeHMUua}k89z6fWRh(Xr+;?a>Jl$)uvzF%X0sSmUph&eO;WPyn$5!cboWkXnvBk$ z?aWO{iduyrqPWz>q7QxOK1dKMY{iF$f*k}=q{yl$(ibgZeTlFWY(-Hz{=Rd*@6O5X zomJ2WA9BJy-}!#upL5Q4&Yk<6lNV<f&vkV<DlFaV1lkPr%rl-f^ub%2X4RzXRay0L zsN2JO9Z2ujj6i6LSn8wK;6tvV!x7pwYVfX%q1vtsZL!N5d^kd#hQWoZKJW>CK%AFY z9-(T);2}-qgWI10#{IGM-;)&VmZ3&{qI8;{^G7XKLUl~Y<^eq2b4!=hlXLI<<#%0w z`q8xu{jbzd?VtQa?#fq;jp_zX;?Z&J&nA@PHYm=7_2aqc&%d3W{=)UWH&0%E?)O6n z-`pL#^P7F(9Sa<i9ZKTohU$9x5sR^!CtZuNnobAY?|@Hsz+c2_->-CW=MB~Mb>I{q z6!(Imy8fz#+xn^d;^%b&_<*tRy&U@SytQ(*;?)Dc7I&g...

A prebuilt binary. Needs non-free Watcom compiler to build. Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> --- dosutil/mdiskchk.com | Bin 8106 -> 0 bytes 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 dosutil/mdiskchk.com diff --git a/dosutil/mdiskchk.com b/dosutil/mdiskchk.com deleted file mode 100644 index

...alse __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "i_stream_read_data" #9 0x080bbcdc in message_parse_header_next (ctx=0x81118f0, hdr_r=0xbf941ec0) at message-header-parser.c:89 msg = ( const unsigned char *) 0x811292f "qan4iKSQ1jgszBF7yO1N1FgdflELgOSeaEzr+P+aEXdIbk/ooMFh+wew7C5rzd2W+AfY+P7e\n3el1/64bLf+hadyHUxkt3auVaT3Y6zcoxZaSmY1gEydp4JcyEVNapSNbsWFKYUTSJiju10VF\nkBLd+JYm8PvXkDSplAEe9MRASmX2Jzt/zG6b39O5byfU5IA6JiBj/5"... i = 6 size = 65 startpos = 64 colon_pos = 4294967295 parse_size = 64 value_pos = <value optimized out>...

ugh :) Today I became infected with the bliss virus, any info on this would be appreciated! How do I scan for files infected and is it possible to remove it? I first noticed the infection when running a program (not as root) messages flashed on the screen about transversing directories and such. The program (gimp) had been working fine since I downloaded the binary for gimp from their main

Comments below. On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > OK, here's a new patch that adds the infrastructure and the > implementation for X86, ARM and PPC of GetInstSize and > GetFunctionSize. Both functions are virtual functions defined in > TargetInstrInfo.h. > > For X86, I moved some commodity functions from X86CodeEmitter to > X86InstrInfo. >

OK, here's a new patch that adds the infrastructure and the implementation for X86, ARM and PPC of GetInstSize and GetFunctionSize. Both functions are virtual functions defined in TargetInstrInfo.h. For X86, I moved some commodity functions from X86CodeEmitter to X86InstrInfo. What do you think? Nicolas Evan Cheng wrote: > > I think both of these belong to TargetInstrInfo. And

...dH7B;{R{n%eoG|FZW<_o~e?b4yL{2P<{2<gO=rJF$D5CUhaT`BC6dp)i!hQhrA3 z16Pd?jM1L3yMj<}>Z};JG=b at YSU7U(S;I`hO%8&PHUx(zSf&Cm%s|@0_IZv%6=HU~ zdn&xtjZoT5ot2(r^x<qru_eDSD5k`7r103V_gHLcxM?ho>(NHy(0-Pv_k{+;ASm28 zZv6t0xl-a|+QJpQ==EZ4$!ah{9&T_kwVBCB)=R_HF4k%&z2GZ-9sVFuC-AfYyc9E3 zs at mlfc3R++ZKP2|BY@`-Ah at +;V^t^fTP7v16Fpjg<zG4RrK7AO@^bKUxz??R$8R;D zb4}5?Oe?j~D>-mZ06U$vxaZRNL$6{ObMfkHT2sDlU%tl}xoZhRe7a#h&!(I>j@>t! z8^ii3EgN9`F|Q8sm^rl*pf&&6l at 5QSqq(5?N*Hp#rI6#;+AUkfGbw{?oaPIM(V!yh z at U)NC(PUS$)M|XBAGDf~Jkgq8=&&1;mFmB@*PA_bPf{0$l`l...

depends on "autoconf: regenerate configure scripts with 4.4 version" This series removes some of the really old deadwood from the tools build and makes some other things which are on their way out configurable at build time with a default depending on how far down the slope I judge them to be. * nuke in tree copy of libaio * nuke obsolete tools: xsview, miniterm, lomount & sv *