Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "after_sieve".
Did you mean:
after_save
2015 Nov 27
2
[g.danti@assyoma.it: Re: Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression]
...roblem, reporting here 7s helpfull if you use dovecot compiled with
> the latest version here, this migth be a unknown bug you then have
> found, but not if you use precompiled problems, then report to the
> maintainers of such software
Hi,
does it means that when you use before_sieve and after_sieve in your
dovecot configuration the hard-linking part works?
I don't need help to upgrade to CentOS 7.x, but before going this route
I would understand if this is how dovecot/pigenhole are expected to work
(don't use hardlinks) or if I misconfigured something.
RedHat / CentOS are a very...
2015 Jul 14
1
Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression
On 14/07/15 12:26, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>
> You asked about "newer dovecot versions", v2.2 does so.
>
Fair enough :)
So, with v2.2+ the hardlink approach is irremediably gone, at least with
LMTP (and without relying to SiS)?
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
2015 Nov 30
0
Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression]
...helpfull if you use dovecot compiled with
>> the latest version here, this migth be a unknown bug you then have
>> found, but not if you use precompiled problems, then report to the
>> maintainers of such software
>
> Hi,
> does it means that when you use before_sieve and after_sieve in your
> dovecot configuration the hard-linking part works?
>
> I don't need help to upgrade to CentOS 7.x, but before going this route
> I would understand if this is how dovecot/pigenhole are expected to work
> (don't use hardlinks) or if I misconfigured something.
>
&g...
2015 Nov 26
2
[g.danti@assyoma.it: Re: Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression]
Il 26-11-2015 15:15 John R. Dennison ha scritto:
> You are strongly encouraged to update that CentOS system. Current is
> 6.7 (released some 3 months ago) and dovecot-2.0.9-19.
Ouch! I copied outdated information from my old post.
My current system _is_ CentOS 6.7 with dovecot
dovecot-2.0.9-19.el6_7.2.x86_64
Sorry for the confusion. Still, the problems remain
> If you find you need a
2015 Jul 13
2
Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression
...he attachments, and not the entire messages, are deduped.
Message-based hardlinks really exists for a reason. The good news is
that I found _why_ they are not working: it depends from how dovecot and
its sieve plugin (pigenhole) interact. Basically, if I define anything
for the before_sieve and after_sieve variables, dovecot stops creating
hardlinks for multiple copies of the same message.
On the other hand, private (per-user) sieve file works without
interfering with hardlinks. In a similar manner, disabling sieve also
permits dovecot to create multiple hardlinks for a single message.
Does some...
2014 Feb 10
3
Undertanding what the lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox actually does
...I could figure
it out, in that
1) I could then send to something more simple like
<senderlocalpart>+saveoutgoing and use the "date" extension of sieve to
generate the split.
2) Users could ultimately decide what to do them selves with this tag
(and I could define a global "after_sieve" to throw it away.
Unfortunately my reading of the fileinto extension is that the
destination can only be a literal string and not a "computed" value
based on the date.
UNLESS anyone knows different?
I would welcome any advice anyone could give me
Thanks
Alan Chandler