search for: afring

I've got configuration which in simple includes combination of afrs and unify - servers exports n[1-3]-brick[12] and n[1-3]-ns and client got cluster configuration: volume afr-ns type cluster/afr subvolumes n1-ns n2-ns n3-ns option data-self-heal on option metadata-self-heal on option entry-self-heal on end-volume volume afr1 type cluster/afr subvolumes n1-brick2

Hi all, I have 4 glusterd servers running a single glusterfs volume. The volume was created using the gluster command line, with no changes from default. The same machines all mount the volume using the native glusterfs client: [root at localhost ~]# gluster volume create datastore replica 2 transport tcp 192.168.253.1:/glusterfs/primary 192.168.253.3:/glusterfs/secondary

Hey Richard, Could you share the following informations please? 1. gluster volume info <volname> 2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brickpath/filepath> 3. glustershd & glfsheal logs Regards, Karthik On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > On a side note, try recently released health

On a side note, try recently released health report tool, and see if it does diagnose any issues in setup. Currently you may have to run it in all the three machines. On 26-Oct-2017 6:50 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for this report. This week many of the developers are at Gluster > Summit in Prague, will be checking this and respond next

Hi Karthik, thanks for taking a look at this. I'm not working with gluster long enough to make heads or tails out of the logs. The logs are attached to this mail and here is the other information: # gluster volume info home Volume Name: home Type: Replicate Volume ID: fe6218ae-f46b-42b3-a467-5fc6a36ad48a Status: Started Snapshot Count: 1 Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 Transport-type: tcp

To test gluster's behavior under heavy load, I'm currently doing this on two machines sharing a common /mnt/gfs gluster mount: ssh bal-6.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs ssh bal-7.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs One of the processes usually dies pretty quickly like this: [608] open

2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected to the 3 > bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using `gluster volume start > engine force`, then launch the heal command like you did earlier and see if > heals

Hi... Started playing with gluster. And the heal functions is my "target" for testing. Short description of my test ---------------------------- * 4 replicas on single machine * glusterfs mounted locally * Create file on glusterfs-mounted directory: date >data.txt * Append to file on one of the bricks: hostname >>data.txt * Trigger a self-heal with: stat data.txt =>

On 07/20/2017 02:20 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: > > 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run > the command? Does it complain anything about these files? > > >

On 07/20/2017 03:42 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > > 2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected > to the 3 bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using

Hi, I'm running glusterFS 3.3.1 on Centos 6.4. ? Gluster volume status Status of volume: glustervol Gluster process Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brick KWTOCUATGS001:/mnt/cloudbrick 24009 Y 20031 Brick KWTOCUATGS002:/mnt/cloudbrick

I know that this is not the appropriate place :). You know someone can alternative to gluserfs ?:) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090107/63b68a0d/attachment.html>

Hi, Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run the > command? Does it complain anything about these files? > No, glustershd.log is clean, no extra log after command on all 3 nodes > 2. Are these 12 files also present in the 3rd data brick?

Hi All. Hoping you can help me with a healing problem. I have one file which didn't self heal. it looks to be a problem with a directory in the path as one node says it's dirty. I have a replica volume with arbiter This is what the 3 nodes say. One brick on each Node1 getfattr -d -m . -e hex /path/to/dir | grep afr getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names

Hi, everyone: We have a glusterfs clusters, version is 3.2.7. The volume info is as below: Volume Name: gfs1 Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 94 x 3 = 282 Transport-type: tcp We native mount the volume in all nodes. When we access the file ?/XMTEXT/gfs1_000/000/000/095? on one nodes, the error is split brain. While we can access the same file on

Dear Members, Even though Gluster team is growing at a steady phase, our aggressive development schedule out phases our resources. We need to expand and also maintain a 1:1 developer / QA engineer ratio. Our major development focus in the next 8 months will be towards: * Large scale regression tests (24/7/365) * Web based monitoring and management * Hot upgrade/add/remove of storage nodes

Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from > > which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? > Yes, there are afr xattrs that determine the heal direction for each > file. The good copy

I have set up a replicated, four-node gluster config for a web farm. The idea is that each web node is its own Gluster server, and will have its own copy of the entire web root locally. It then serves the cluster to itself via a mount. We're running it over dual GigE NICs bonded. The problem I am having is when we switch live traffic to nodes in the cluster, they almost immediately get

Are there known performance issues with using glusterfs on software raid? I've been playing with a variety of configs (AFR, AFR with Unify) on a two server setup. Everything seems to work well, but performance (creating files, reading files, appending to files) is very slow. Using the same configs on two non-software raid machines shows significant performance increases. Before I go a

I should add that in /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0-shd.vol and in all other configs in /var/lib/glusterd/ on all three machines the nodes are consistently named client-2: zephyrosaurus client-3: alvarezsaurus client-4: nanosaurus This is normal. It was the second time that a brick was removed, so client-0 and client-1 are gone. So the problem is the file attibutes themselves. And there I see