search for: afps

...d symbol, but an explicitly built legend using the same labels did. Example (I am trying to get the less than or equal to symbol): > .df <- data.frame(afp = c(0,0,1,1), time=c(0,2,0,1), surv=c(1, 0.5, 1, 0.4)) > afpLabels <- c("AFP \u2264 16", "AFP > 16") > afpStrata <- factor(.df$afp, labels=afpLabels) > afpStrata [1] AFP ? 16 AFP ? 16 AFP > 16 AFP > 16 Levels: AFP = 16 AFP > 16 The first level is reported as "AFP = 16". > levels(afpStrata) [1] "AFP ? 16" "AFP > 16" > The desired result is produced...

I guess I'm sort of surprised and I expected better performance I have a new server set up with RAID 10 drives (6) Repeated a number of times and though I am clumsy with stop watch timing, these numbers appear to be close enough for government work... Server, CentOS 5.2 and updated earlier today, just installed a week ago. Client, Macintosh G4, OS X 10.4.11 NFS Mount is done with the

Hello Rsync Community, I have been using rsync for several years to backup servers across an array of different areas. I have run into a new problem that I cannot find an answer for. We just recently purchased a Lacie 5Big Network RAID: http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1596257 for one organization. We set up a test server to start backing up to this RAID via AFP. The

(This is a brief announcement of a focused development/refinement of the Netatalk project.) The primary goal of Baltra is to provide a Mac OS X compatible AFP file sharing service with Samba 3.0 compatibility. We are hoping to have an AFP file sharing daemon which can run in parallel with Samba 3.0 to provide seemless file sharing amoungst SMB-based clients (Windows and MacOS-X) as well as

Hi, I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy files from a macOS 10.12.2 system to an AFP mounted share. The command I'm using is: rsync -avAX -M--fake-super ./testDir ./mnt/testDir/ This works fine and all the extended attributes are copied and readable. I then try to use rsync to copy these files back with: rsync -avAX --fake-super -M--super ./mnt/testDir/ ./testDir2/ This

Hi, I have run into the following I bonded 6 NICs on my Cent OS server into a 600MB pipe. I use bond method 4 = dynamic Link aggregation. My Cysco Switch supports this apparently. However I only get increased bandwidth from my MAC by connecting via AFP. However when I connect via SMB I don't. I was told to change the sockect options to the following on my smb.conf file on my fileserver:

Assuming you are aware Apple 10.12.1/2 did a number on crypto, broke SSH, HTTPS to "legacy" servers. R/ Everett Batey / Skype: wa6cre-10 / efbatey at gmail.com Please visit So Calif Linux Expo http://www.socallinuxexpo.org On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Steven Kilby <stevenkilby2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy

It is "APM" Apple Partition Map, not "AFP" Apple Filing Protocol Reported-by: Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup at gmx.net> --- utils/isohybrid.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/utils/isohybrid.c b/utils/isohybrid.c index 05afd29..15f63fc 100644 --- a/utils/isohybrid.c +++ b/utils/isohybrid.c @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ printh(void) printf(FMT,

Hi, I configured Samba 4.8.5 on Debian (Buster) with vfs_fruit as a TimeMachine destination and while it detects it and does the initial backup to some extent (30GB out of 200GB), TimeMachine then fails with a message about the disk identity having changed. Options are “don’t backup” and “backup anyway”. When using “backup anyway”, the backup creates a secondary sparse image and starts from

Any BFD/AFP softwares available for FreeBSD 4.10? Im getting flooded with ssh and ftp attempts.

Hi, Geert Stappers: > Reported-by: Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup at gmx.net> > utils/isohybrid.c | 2 +- It would be somewhat ridiculous to fix only this. {:) Can you point me to an example how a well acceptable patch set should look like ? I expect about half a dozen separate bug fixes to be needed. (Is there a tutorial "SYSLINUX from Git for Dummies" ?) Have a nice day :)

Hi, Geert Stappers > You will see the recent commits, including the 'fseek' to 'fseeko' change. I was looking at http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git which is what Google brings up on "syslinux git" and looks quite official. Now i wonder about +#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 after it was already done in Makefile some time earlier. Luckily,

Hi, as I have learned from the discussion about which SSD to use as ZIL drives, I stumbled across this article, that discusses short stroking for increasing IOPs on SAS and SATA drives: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/short-stroking-hdd,2157.html Now, I am wondering if using a mirror of such 15k SAS drives would be a good-enough fit for a ZIL on a zpool that is mainly used for file

I have a need to use the unsupported kernel for one feature only (AFP/Appletalk support). Never having had to use it before, I''m unsure of what''s all in it other than reading it''s config file. From those that do use it -- is it considered stable enough to use in lightweight production? I''m debating the use of it versus wasting my time rebuilding the normal

Hello group, I have an OSX 10.3.9 Server that I'm trying to back up with rsync 3.0.2. Since I didn't have any luck with the 10.3.9 patch and I do have 10.4 clients, I decided to try running the backup over AFP (Apple's file sharing protocol). I found a way to mount the AFP volume with root permissions and rsync 3.0.2 works very nicely using this on the 10.4 clients, preserving

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [please cc to my address] Dear Samba and Netatalk experts, I've got a server running both samba 2.2.3a as PDC and netatalk (1.5pre7 as supplied by SuSE73). Samba machine accounts are added to /etc/passwd automatically by the command add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 90 -s /bin/false -M %u when a NT machine is added to the

Hello! [Cc to stable@, for wider audience] The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without them. 1) AppleTalk Last time claimed to be supported by vendor in 2007[1]. In practice had very little use since 90th. Discontinued by major routing equipment vendors since 2009[2].

Hello Everyone, We've observed a problem in with the latest version of samba and vfs_fruit and was wondering if anyone has seen the same problem. Samba 4.3.4 with vfs_fruit enabled allows a Mac client to rename a directory when another client has another client has open files in that directory. The fix for this bug brought this functional change to vs_fruit: BUG 11065: vfs_fruit: Enable

On 23 January 2017 at 14:05:00, samba-request at lists.samba.org (samba-request at lists.samba.org) wrote: interesting. I just tested today the same operation via a different protocol  (AFP) and against macOS AFP server and got a similar issue (error -43 in  Finder).  There may be something wrong with the client atm. You could test against macOS  SMB server and if it's broken there as well,

hi@all i'm using netatalk and samba as fileserver for different clients (OS9,X,WinNT/2K/XP) to create shares, that are visible and accessible for all clients (via afp/smb) i created a folder and made it public in all daemons (atalk, samba) to get a better file handling i'm using the samba feature: vfs object = netatalk but there are still some problems files that are created via afp