search for: aforementionned

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 966 matches for "aforementionned".

Did you mean: aforementioned
2020 Jun 29
5
Heads-up: Handling target-specific intrinsics in InstCombine
Hello, this mail is to raise awareness of https://reviews.llvm.org/D81728, which is substantial enough of a conceptual change that it should probably at least be mentioned in llvm-dev. InstCombine has dealt with target-specific intrinsics for a long time, since its fix-point iteration is arguably the right place to do so. A downside is that there's a pull to add an increasing amount of code
2019 Feb 04
3
Signing KRLs?
Hi! While reading through PROTOCOL.krl I came across "5. KRL signature sections". If my understanding is correct - and that's basically what I would like to get knocked down for if appropriate ;) - this is a way for SSHDs to ensure they only accept KRLs signed by a trusted CA. However, I cannot seem to find a way to actually _sign_ a KRL with ssh-keygen? The aforementioned
2016 Mar 28
2
-H option causes unneccessary transfers
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:11:07AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > What does --itemize-changes say about these files? > > Also, what is --atimes? Is this the Apple modified rsync for OSX? > > On 03/28/2016 07:51 AM, Albert Berger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > when the daily system backup with rsync is
2003 Sep 18
3
Freeing blocks not in datazone
These came up on dmesg this morning: attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1635237736, limit=976791680 attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1635237736, limit=976791680 EXT3-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 4293394431, count = 1 attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1930439616,
2017 Sep 11
5
Different ways of running lit
What are all the different ways people run lit? I'm doing some refactoring and want to make sure I have all the based covered. Obviously you can use check-llvm. And you can also run llvm-lit.py in your bin directory and point it to your source tree. What else? Both of the aforementioned methods require running cmake first, is there any use case where someone runs lit without having run
2011 Feb 08
3
strptime "March 14 2010" and NA?
Converting date strings that range between Mar-14-2010 2:00 and Mar-14-2010 2:59 (inclusive) to date objects (POSIX) returns a NA entity: > strptime("3/14/2010 2:00",format="%m/%d/%Y %H:%M") [1] "2010-03-14 02:00:00" This looks fine, however other functions such as plot see a NA object instead: > is.na(strptime("3/14/2010
2013 Jan 10
4
Minimum requirements for CentOS 4,5,6
Hey everyone, I'm trying to compile a document to send out to our customers that outlines the minimum and recommended requirements to run C4, C5, and C6. Does anyone know the particulars? When we order systems, it's usually Pentium Dual Core CPU, 120GB+ Hard drive, 2GB Ram. I need the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM requirements to install and run any of the aforementioned flavors as a
2012 Feb 27
2
Xen 3.4.4 security fixes
Hi Everyone, I note that Xen 3.4.4 has been released http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2012/01/27/xen-3-4-4-update-release/ There is something that I am confused about though. In the release announcement, it mentions one of the features of the update being: " Security enhancements includingCVE-2011-1583 <http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-1583>" However,
2014 Nov 18
2
Syslinux 6.03, kernel not relocatable.
On 11/17/2014 12:55 AM, Didier Spaier wrote: > > So one more question: why can one boot with a GRUB EFI bootloader > but not with the SYSLINUX bootloader, using the same kernel? > > More accurately, I know why: because of the aforementioned patch, but > then, why is this test needed in SYSLINUX only? > Because Grub boots the kernel in a "hostile" way (not using
2016 Mar 28
2
-H option causes unneccessary transfers
Greetings, when the daily system backup with rsync is performed, thousands of files (e.g. from /usr directory), which are not modified are uselessly transferrred to the backup storage every day. The rsync command is the following: rsync --update -DHAErlptgo --relative --atimes --delete-during ${SRCPATH} ${BACKUPDIR} Quick investigation shown, that these files are hard links, and the command
2012 Oct 12
3
[PATCH] explicitly use escaped minus in man pages
--- man/man1/unicorn.1 | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- man/man1/unicorn_rails.1 | 34 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/man1/unicorn.1 b/man/man1/unicorn.1 index 0b496af..749272a 100644 --- a/man/man1/unicorn.1 +++ b/man/man1/unicorn.1 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ unicorn - a rackup-like command to launch the Unicorn HTTP
2006 Jul 24
2
samba-3.0.23a, get_dc_list failures
Tried upgrading a couple of working samba-3.0.22 boxes that are currently members of our ads domain to samba-3.0.23a. Before the upgrade: $ kinit foo@BAR.com $ net ads testjoin $ net ads join works fine. After the upgrade $ net ads testjoin $ net ads join both hang. So I tried $ net ads testjoin -d4 and found that it returns: [2006/07/24 10:12:27, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1502)
2014 Aug 12
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] For alias analysis, It's gcc too aggressive or LLVM need to improve?
I'll take this from the C++ angle; the C rules are not the same, and I'm not confident they give the same answer. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > The access path matters (in some sense), but this is, AFIAK, valid no > matter how you look at it. > > Let's take a look line by line > > #include <stdio.h> >
2017 Aug 14
2
clang-tidy : Modify cert-err60-cpp configuration
We want to modify the aforementioned check so that it does not flag the exceptions that aren't nothrow copy constructible/assignable. This page http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/#using-clang-tidy tells me to dump the configs of all the checks using %clang-tidy -checks=* -dump-config but it does not mention the cert-err60-cpp. How do I modify the configuration of this check so that it
2016 May 14
2
More recent libvirt builds for CentOS 7
Hello list, is there a way to get more recent libvirt builds for CentOS 7 that include support for the xl (modern Xen) toolstack? I tried to build libvirt from the SRPM, which succeeded, however, without the mentioned Xen parts. I have also found two repos from people who provide upstream libvirt builds for CentOS 7, again, without the Xen parts. -
2014 Aug 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] For alias analysis, It's gcc too aggressive or LLVM need to improve?
+aliasing people I *think* this is valid, because the rules have always been described to me in terms of underlying storage type, and not access path. These are all ints, so all loads and stores can alias. On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tim Northover" <t.p.northover at gmail.com>
2010 Oct 07
2
first post and bootstarpping problems
Hello to all R users, I use R for a year now and am dealing with geometric morphometrics of deer skulls. Yes, I am a biologist and my math skills are just beginning to brush up. To cut to the chase... I have two groups in my data (males and females) and my data is in a simple vector form. Now I need a bootstrap test for this value szc1 <- ((mean(maleCent)-mean(femaCent))^
2012 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:29:56 +0200 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > > So if i understand right, i can't directly compile the c code using > > clang. And i need to manually generate some llvm ir to replace the > > builtin function. > > > > Is that right? > > I think so, though I don't know much about
2010 Oct 22
3
R step-by-step execution
Hello! I wouldl ike to ask you if R supports step by step execution. I have written some nested loops and I would like to check on every step what are the values of some variables. Printing all the variables just creates a really big output of numbers. Could you please give some debugging tutorial that included the aforementioned functionalities? |Moreover can you please tell me how I
2017 Jul 03
2
Unable to Receive Emails from Phabricator
Dear all, I just created this revision <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34937> but I did not receive any email for it even though it says 'Automatically Subscribed' on the right. Also, even my profile shows no trace of the aforementioned revision. It shows that my last activity was on 24th May. Additionally, just to verify that I am not receiving any emails from Phabricator, I logged