search for: afn

Dear all, I get the error when I use maxent.jar: Error .jcall(mxe, "S", "fit", c("autorun", "-e", afn, "-o", dirout, : java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: density.Params.readFromArgs([Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String; sessionInfo() result: R version 2.14.0 (2011-10-31)Platform: i386-pc-mingw32/i386 (32-bit)locale:[1] LC_COLLATE=Chinese_People's Republic of China.936 [2] LC_CTYPE=Ch...

...s like this: Before r317488 we had 6 bits that respectively represented: UnsafeMath nnan ninf nsz arcp contract *unset* (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) nnan ninf nsz arcp contract *afn* (new bit) Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. * Problem * Given we currently have no way to check if a bitcode file has be...

...> nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *unset* > > (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) > > After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: > reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) > nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *afn* (new bit) > > Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. > > > * Problem * > > Given we currently have no wa...

...h > nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *unset* > > (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) > > After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: > reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) > nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *afn* (new bit) > > Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should > also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true > if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. > > > * Problem * > > Given we currently have...

...h > nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *unset* > > (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) > > After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: > reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) > nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *afn* (new bit) > > Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should > also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true > if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. > > > * Problem * > > Given we currently have...

...> nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *unset* > > (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) > > After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: > reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) > nnan > ninf > nsz > arcp > contract > *afn* (new bit) > > Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. > > > * Problem * > > Given we currently have no wa...

...ract >> *unset* >> >> (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) >> >> After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: >> reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) >> nnan >> ninf >> nsz >> arcp >> contract >> *afn* (new bit) >> >> Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. >> >> >> * Problem * >> >> G...

...;> (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) >>> >>> After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: >>> reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) >>> nnan >>> ninf >>> nsz >>> arcp >>> contract >>> *afn* (new bit) >>> >>> Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should >>> also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true >>> if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. >>> >>> &g...

...that? -Andy From: Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 1:01 PM To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> Subject: Re: [FP] Constant folding math library functions Hi, Andy, This is somewhat tricky. 'afn' is for approximate functions, to "allow substitution of approximate calculations for functions", but in this case, the answers aren't any more approximate than the original function calls. Different, but likely no less accurate. This has long caused these kinds of subtle differen...

...ntract >> *unset* >> >> (The order may not match what is exactly in the bitcode.) >> >> After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: >> reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) >> nnan >> ninf >> nsz >> arcp >> contract >> *afn* (new bit) >> >> Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should >> also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true >> if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. >> >> >> * Problem * >&...

...ram against a different version of the math library than was used by the compiler I may get a different result. I can prevent this constant folding with either the 'nobuiltin' or 'strictfp' attribute. However, it seems to me like this optimization should really be checking the 'afn' fast math flag. Opinions? Thanks, Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190416/aa3a458f/attachment.html>

...is exactly in the bitcode.) >>>> >>>> After r317488 we had 7 bits that respectively represented: >>>> reassoc (-UnsafeMath- is gone) >>>> nnan >>>> ninf >>>> nsz >>>> arcp >>>> contract >>>> *afn* (new bit) >>>> >>>> Before r317488, fast-math was true if UnsafeMath was true (this should >>>> also imply all the other flags are sets). After r317488, fast-math is true >>>> if all the bits are set, in particular the afn, new one, too. >>>...

...bute on the call site is better? And in that case it feels like we’d be circling back toward “nobuiltin” but can the front end identify which call sites would need that? Could this not be a function attribute if it’s intended to be consistent across entire functions/programs? I agree with Hal that afn doesn’t sound like the right approach, and in terms of how the compiler actually treats these calls (I’m thinking about more than constant folding here) then it seems to be that this is the same as -fno-builtin. For example, can the optimizer assume some properties about the result value of a call...

...om.puppetlabs.jdbc$make_connection_pool.invoke(jdbc.clj:161) at com.puppetlabs.jdbc$pooled_datasource.invoke(jdbc.clj:189) at com.puppetlabs.puppetdb.cli.services$_main.doInvoke(services.clj:366) at clojure.lang.RestFn.invoke(RestFn.java:421) at clojure.lang.Var.invoke(Var.java:419) at clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper(AFn.java:163) at clojure.lang.Var.applyTo(Var.java:532) at clojure.core$apply.invoke(core.clj:601) at com.puppetlabs.puppetdb.core$_main.doInvoke(core.clj:79) at clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo(RestFn.java:137) at com.puppetlabs.puppetdb.core.main(Unknown Source) ================ Puppet...

Hi Tom,  I´m very glad using Shorewall I proud to say that use it in my whole network (215 Real IP´s over ProxyArp) I can filter everyone have mac-control of then etc etc. Well I´m like a child playing with it :) But now, have a question there is any way to filter or use an Anti-virus in this network ? To drop packets with virus ?? To scan HTTP request ?? Or maybe use Dansguardian ? Did you

...irections on that? Thank you in advance. Here is my info: # (1) the error > me <- maxent(predictors, occtrain, factors='biome') me <- maxent(predictors, occtrain, factors='biome') Error in .jcall(mxe, "S", "fit", c("autorun", "-e", afn, "-o", dirout, : java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class density.DirectorySelect # (2) the variables for maxent: predictors, and occtrain > summary(predictors) summary(predictors) Cells: 35712 NAs : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5...

Good day, all, I'm trying to transfer a 174M file to a system with 1.2G free. Other files in the tree come over just fine, but this transfer dies partway through: rsync -avvz -e ssh --partial --progress server.with.the.file:/server/directory /local/directory opening connection using ssh server.with.the.file rsync --server --sender -vvlogDtprz --partial . /local/directory receiving file

...00,18 @@ void blk_queue_lld_busy(struct request_queue *q, lld_busy_fn *fn) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_lld_busy); /** + * blk_queue_abort_queue - set driver specific abort function + * @q: queue + * @mbfn: abort_queue_fn + */ +void blk_queue_abort_queue(struct request_queue *q, abort_queue_fn *afn) +{ + q->abort_queue_fn = afn; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_abort_queue); + + +/** * blk_set_default_limits - reset limits to default values * @lim: the queue_limits structure to reset * diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h index 2aa2466..e2d58bd 100644 --- a/includ...

...00,18 @@ void blk_queue_lld_busy(struct request_queue *q, lld_busy_fn *fn) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_lld_busy); /** + * blk_queue_abort_queue - set driver specific abort function + * @q: queue + * @mbfn: abort_queue_fn + */ +void blk_queue_abort_queue(struct request_queue *q, abort_queue_fn *afn) +{ + q->abort_queue_fn = afn; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_abort_queue); + + +/** * blk_set_default_limits - reset limits to default values * @lim: the queue_limits structure to reset * diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h index 2aa2466..e2d58bd 100644 --- a/includ...

Here's another easy rsync question (I am trying to make sense of some stuff): Let's say I have this burp file, which I set the follow uid/gid: raub@kushana-13>ls -l burp -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody4 noaccess 44800 Feb 18 13:07 burp raub@kushana-14> When I move it to katri, since it does not have those uid/gid defined, it just spits them out as the appropriate numbers (that were