Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "afis".
Did you mean:
abis
2009 Feb 17
1
[LLVMdev] ARM backend playing with alternative jump table implementations
Hi list:
I have been trying to get my feet wet with the ARM backend.
As a warmup exercise I wanted to be able to move
jumptables especially large ones out of the code section.
Currently the idiom for jump tables loooks like this
// .set PCRELV0, (.LJTI9_0_0-(.LPCRELL0+8))
// .LPCRELL0:
// add r3, pc, #PCRELV0
// ldr pc, [r3, +r0, lsl #2]
// .LJTI9_0_0:
//
2011 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] bug in ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan
Hello LLVMDev,
I've encountered what looks like a bug in LLVM 2.9, it doesn't appear to be fixed in 3.0 either.
The problem occurs in function ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan. There's a circular dependency in setting the variable BigStack and AFI->setHashStackFrame(true). The expression which initializes BigStack calls estimateRSSStackSizeLimit which in
2006 Oct 26
1
Quantile regression questions
...atively new to R, but am intrigued by its flexibility. I am interested in quantile regression and quantile estimation as regards to cotton fiber length distributions. The length distribution affects spinning and weaving properties, so it is desirable to select for certain distribution types. The AFIS fiber testing machinery outputs a vector for each sample of type c(12, 235, 355, . . . n) with the number of fibers in n=40 1/16 inch length categories. My question is what would be the best way to convert the raw output to quantiles and whether it would be appropriate to use quantile regression t...
2011 Dec 05
1
[LLVMdev] bug in ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan
Hi Alok,
Echoing Anton's statements, please provide a testcase! :)
Apart from that, looking at your patch and description I actually think that it is estimateRSStackSizeLimit that is wrong.
It is performing a check for a Thumb2 addressing mode whether the target has a FP register. That's the main check - for some reason it is appending another check AFI->hasStackFrame() which seems
2016 Sep 23
3
Formación en bigdata
Buenas,
¿Alguien ha hecho algun curso sobre bigdata que merezca la pena? La verdad es quequiero adquirir competencias sobre el manejo de grandes volumenes de información, hadoop, spark, etc y no se muy bien que estudios cursar. He estado mirando, pero veo que las escuelas de negocio lo orientan a big data + business analytics y no se si pueden pasar muy por encim adel tema o estar centrados en la
2015 Jan 11
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] [PATCH] add tail call optimization to thumb1-only targets
Hello,
find enclosed a first patch for adding tail call optimizations for
thumb1 targets.
I assume that this list is the right place for publishing patches for
review?
Since this is my first proposal for LLVM, I'd very much appreciate your
feedback.
What the patch is meant to do:
For Tail calls identified during DAG generation, the target address will
be loaded into a register
by use
2009 Jun 03
5
[LLVMdev] patch for llc/ARM: added mechanism to move switch tables from .text -> .data; also cleanup and documentation
Hi:
This is my first patch submission. Hopefully, this is the proper the protocol.
Attached is a patch for the llc ARM backend:
Added mechanism to generate switch table in a data section
rather than having it interleaved with the code.
This is controlled by command line flags and off by default.
Also, tried to document and improve the code where I modified it.
Robert
-------------- next part
2013 Oct 21
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Unwanted r11 in push/pop on Cortex-M.
To recap, this is what I was trying to solve:
This C code:
int bar(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f);
int foo(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e )
{
int x = 3*a;
return bar3(a,b,c,d,e,x);
}
Produced the following assembly output:
foo:
push {r11, lr}
sub sp, #8
bl bar
add sp, #8
pop {r11, pc}
The part I didn't like is that push/pop become
2011 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] bug in ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan
Hello Alok,
> I fixed this by performing the CanEliminateFrame and
> RegInfo->cannotEliminateFrame checks before the call to
> estimateRSSStackSizeLimit, since these values are available before BigStack
> is initialized. Does that sound reasonable? I’ve attached a patch with my
> change.
Will you please provide a testcase which reproduces the problem?
Thanks!
--
With best
2009 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] patch for llc/ARM: added mechanism to move switch tables from .text -> .data; also cleanup and documentation
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:42 PM, robert muth wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2009, at 6:59 AM, robert muth wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Evan Cheng<evan.cheng at apple.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> +cl::opt<std::string>
2009 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] patch for llc/ARM: added mechanism to move switch tables from .text -> .data; also cleanup and documentation
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2009, at 6:59 AM, robert muth wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Evan Cheng<evan.cheng at apple.com>
>> wrote:
>>> +cl::opt<std::string> FlagJumpTableSection("jumptable-section",
>>> +
2009 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] patch for llc/ARM: added mechanism to move switch tables from .text -> .data; also cleanup and documentation
Evan:
Sorry for the late follow up, I was out of town last week.
Enclosed please find the updated patch including all
your suggestions and a dejagnus test.
Robert
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:42 PM, robert muth wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com>
2016 Nov 09
0
[PATCH] filearch: Add s390 and s390x detection and tests.
Unfortunately I was unable to build s390 binaries since multilib was
dropped in Fedora 24 on s390x. Going from the source of the 'file'
command it seems as if it prints "32-bit" (the architecture is really
31 bit).
---
generator/actions.ml | 12 ++++++++++++
src/filearch.c | 10 ++++++++++
test-data/Makefile.am | 2 ++
2014 Jun 24
3
[PATCH 1/2] Drop dosutil/mdiskchk.com
A prebuilt binary. Needs non-free Watcom compiler to build.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk>
---
dosutil/mdiskchk.com | Bin 8106 -> 0 bytes
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 dosutil/mdiskchk.com
diff --git a/dosutil/mdiskchk.com b/dosutil/mdiskchk.com
deleted file mode 100644
index
2008 Oct 09
5
Panic 1.1.4
Hi List,
try 1.1.4 and have new Panics in Log. Hoped that 1.1.3 finishes this
errors...
Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Loading modules from
directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Module loaded:
/usr/lib/dovecot/imap/lib20_mail_log_plugin.so
Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Effective uid=857, gid=628,
1997 Jan 31
10
Linux virus
ugh :)
Today I became infected with the bliss virus, any info on this would be
appreciated! How do I scan for files infected and is it possible to
remove it? I first noticed the infection when running a program (not as
root) messages flashed on the screen about transversing directories and
such. The program (gimp) had been working fine since I downloaded the
binary for gimp from their main
2008 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
Comments below.
On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote:
> OK, here's a new patch that adds the infrastructure and the
> implementation for X86, ARM and PPC of GetInstSize and
> GetFunctionSize. Both functions are virtual functions defined in
> TargetInstrInfo.h.
>
> For X86, I moved some commodity functions from X86CodeEmitter to
> X86InstrInfo.
>
2008 Apr 15
4
[LLVMdev] Being able to know the jitted code-size before emitting
OK, here's a new patch that adds the infrastructure and the
implementation for X86, ARM and PPC of GetInstSize and GetFunctionSize.
Both functions are virtual functions defined in TargetInstrInfo.h.
For X86, I moved some commodity functions from X86CodeEmitter to
X86InstrInfo.
What do you think?
Nicolas
Evan Cheng wrote:
>
> I think both of these belong to TargetInstrInfo. And
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com>
---
AUTHORS | 17 ++++++
README | 10 +++
conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++
conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++
conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++
2013 Jul 31
29
[PATCH 0/9] tools: remove or disable old/useless/unused/unmainted stuff
depends on "autoconf: regenerate configure scripts with 4.4 version"
This series removes some of the really old deadwood from the tools build
and makes some other things which are on their way out configurable at
build time with a default depending on how far down the slope I judge
them to be.
* nuke in tree copy of libaio
* nuke obsolete tools: xsview, miniterm, lomount & sv
*