Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "afirmatively".
Did you mean:
affirmatively
2001 Dec 20
2
R for solaris
Dear members in the group. I am trying to start using R. The unix
systme we have in my university is solaris 7. Is there a version of R
for Solaris 7?. If afirmative where could I get it?
Thanks in advance.
Jose A. Farfan
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send
2006 Sep 19
5
VT 64bit kernel with >4Gb RAM
Hi there,
I have the lucky task to setup a Xen system.
my plateform is a dell 2950 with 16Gb of RAM.
I got as far as setting up debian sarge and xen following
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/423
and overcoming some specific difficulties
(http://kmuto.jp/b.cgi/debian/d-i-2615.htm &
http://wiki.ncsa.uiuc.edu/wiki/Dell_PE1950_NIC_Firmware_Workaround)
But, my concern now, while
2009 May 09
1
determination of where a call is placed from (physical location)
...ss such as one party notification vs 2 party notification
requirements which depend upon the physical endpoints of a call. If I
wish to discretely record all incoming calls except those calling from
a place requiring 2 party notification (thus avoiding the need for an
overt announcement) How can I afirmatively determine the physical
location of the party originating the call and thus the applicable
legal jurisdiction.
Eric Fort
2007 May 14
13
Multihome load balancing - kernel vs netfilter
Hi,
I have searched the archives on the topic, and it seems that the list
gurus favor load balancing to be done in the kernel as opposed to other
means. I have been using a home-grown approach, which splits traffic
based on `-m statistic --mode random --probability X`, then CONNMARKs
the individual connections and the kernel happily routes them. I
understand that for > 2 links it will become
2009 Jun 25
1
interaction terms formula error
Hi,
I'm trying to fit a binary logistic regression model, and would like to consider certain characteristics B and C only for people with variable A=1 and not for those with variable A=0, so I'm trying to do the following:
model<- lrm(formula= y ~ A: (B+C) + D + E +...)
I've had no problem with adding interaction terms using " * ", but every time I try to use