search for: afirm

Dear members in the group. I am trying to start using R. The unix systme we have in my university is solaris 7. Is there a version of R for Solaris 7?. If afirmative where could I get it? Thanks in advance. Jose A. Farfan -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the &q...

...understanding, if I had a 64bit kernel I''d see them (pae beeing only for 32bit systems, right ?) And I''m guessing if I want to VMise 64bit OSes, I''ll need it. So : Is there a debian prepackaged kernel that''d do the trick, or do I have to compile my own ? In the afirmative, what patch should I apply and where is that friendly 64bit option ? Is there something else I''m missing ? Thanks, GdL. references : # uname -r 2.6.16-1-xen-686 (the one from "deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main") # cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal:...

...ss such as one party notification vs 2 party notification requirements which depend upon the physical endpoints of a call. If I wish to discretely record all incoming calls except those calling from a place requiring 2 party notification (thus avoiding the need for an overt announcement) How can I afirmatively determine the physical location of the party originating the call and thus the applicable legal jurisdiction. Eric Fort

Hi, I have searched the archives on the topic, and it seems that the list gurus favor load balancing to be done in the kernel as opposed to other means. I have been using a home-grown approach, which splits traffic based on `-m statistic --mode random --probability X`, then CONNMARKs the individual connections and the kernel happily routes them. I understand that for > 2 links it will become

Hi, I'm trying to fit a binary logistic regression model, and would like to consider certain characteristics B and C only for people with variable A=1 and not for those with variable A=0, so I'm trying to do the following: model<- lrm(formula= y ~ A: (B+C) + D + E +...) I've had no problem with adding interaction terms using " * ", but every time I try to use