search for: afap

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "afap".

Did you mean: adap
2009 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] detailed comparison of generated code size for LLVM and other compilers
...While I would say that, to be fair, the comparison should be made with the same options (-O3 only or something of the sort), ICC is specific for Intel and GCC is highly tuned to, which is not the case of LLVM. Still, if the target is specified, I'd assume we should enable all tested and proven (AFAP) optimizations to that particular platform by default. So, my question is: are those optimizations turned off by default because they're experimental? --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
2005 Mar 03
4
Steroids for Rsync!
...ly feeding 'file opened for write was just closed' notifications to rsync, it could efficiently and continuously mirror an active file system. With enough bandwidth, the time lag could be mere seconds. My challenge is to mirror 300 gigs of half meg files on to three remote filesystems, afap. Most of the files are 'write and leave for two months' with some being 'write 4 times a day' so rsync should be perfect if it can be told right after the file is created. We are installing fiber to our building so this might be the perfect combination to come up with a five sec...
2009 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] detailed comparison of generated code size for LLVM and other compilers
> You'll probably need to some digging to make sure the defaults are exactly > comparable. Are SSE and/or MMX used? This affects floating point codegen > quite a bit. Are the target CPUs the same? Good point. Would "generic i686" be a reasonable choice? Does that even mean anything these days? Anyway-- I'd appreciate some guidance on what you folks would find
2009 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] detailed comparison of generated code size for LLVM and other compilers
On Dec 14, 2009, at 1:49 PM, John Regehr wrote: >> You'll probably need to some digging to make sure the defaults are >> exactly >> comparable. Are SSE and/or MMX used? This affects floating point >> codegen >> quite a bit. Are the target CPUs the same? > > Good point. Would "generic i686" be a reasonable choice? Does that > even
2009 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] detailed comparison of generated code size for LLVM and other compilers
...at, to be fair, the comparison should be made with > the same options (-O3 only or something of the sort), ICC is specific > for Intel and GCC is highly tuned to, which is not the case of LLVM. > Still, if the target is specified, I'd assume we should enable all > tested and proven (AFAP) optimizations to that particular platform by > default. > > So, my question is: are those optimizations turned off by default > because they're experimental? The issue here is more arbitrary differences due to different default code generation choices; for example, clang defaults...
1998 Jul 14
0
Remote announcing a Sun
...configure the Unices to let the tokenring pc's see the Sun? Should I transfer the master browser function to the Linux which does the routing? We have just a workgroup, so no domain here at all. Thanks in advance! And please answer to my personal address too, I'd like to have the solution AFAP. Thx! :) GA'BRIEL, A'kos FAX: (+36-1) 4312-977 mailto: gabriel@lhsystems.hu Phone: (+36-1) 4312-979