search for: afaiks

This is strange behavior because as soon as I start mysqld with a clean error log, I get the following messages: 110720 21:38:47 [Note] /usr/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections. Version: '5.5.14-log' socket: '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' port: 2500 MySQL Community Server (GPL) by Remi 110720 21:38:48 [Warning] Access denied for user

In this message I try to summarize what I have learned in these last two weeks. My primary sources of informations were the * list archives and linux ISDN docs. I ain't no * master, so don't trust too hard. Relevant messages from the * list for the current discussion are: 009177.html 009268.html 0498.html 0849.html My setup is an Eicon Diva (HiSax: Eicon.Diehl Diva driver Rev. 1.1.4.2)

You guys mix to things. > AFAIK is the 'privileges' that are host-specific. Is correct. >the policies are on the domain (in the LDAP data, > the root DN, look at them!). Yes, but only the GPO policies and these are not applied to the samba server. And because of that, samba-tools password settings needs to be set on every DC. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 25 May 2013 20:42, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >> Could you please incorporate this useful document into LLVM's official >> documentation? I think that this is good content for encouraging greater >> external/downstream involvement in the release process.

Am 14.03.2017 um 15:10 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: > Look into the "autossh" program, which is very good to manage and > maintain such tunnels. > Hi Nico and other ssh users, Systemd restarts the ssh if it terminates. AFAIK this is all that is needed. But maybe I am missing something. Is there a feature of autossh that I don't get with systemd? --

Hi All, I updated the copyright section of the developer policy: http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright This change doesn't affect any llvm policies, it just makes the developer policy reflect reality. The previous version (archived here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.7/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright) used to claim that all copyright was assigned to the university of

Hi, could someone answer my following questions about dovecot indexes? - If I delete dovecot indexes, it recreates them without any problem, right? - If dovecot recreates indexes, it does not affect users (they don't have to download all emails again, seen flag is not lost etc.) or is there any problem? - If I use mail_location = ...:INDEX=MEMORY, it recreates indexes every time dovecot is

Sorry, I initially included LLVM-Commits rather than LLVM-Dev. Fixed. On 26 January 2017 at 03:26, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dean, Renato, > > AFAIK, unfortunately, these critical Arm32 XRay fixes are not yet in 4.0: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624 , https://reviews.llvm.org/D28623 . The > first repairs XRay instrumentation map emission.

Hi All, $subject says it pretty much all. AFAIk quite a few nouveau contributors are coming to Fosdem, and I think it would be nice to have dinner together Friday evening before FOSDEM. So any takers? If you want to join please reply to this mail thread before coming Thursday, I will try to reserve a table at:

I first met this problem when our (60 students) internetgateway refused to boot its new kernel, it was a 4.7-RELEASE. Then i loaded the old kernel and went home to check if my 4.8-STABLE does likewise. And the answer was yes! Both kernels were GENERIC + these options taken from the dummynet man pages: options DUMMYNET options NMBCLUSTERS options HZ When i boot the machine

I have a strange behavior on a customer's server and I don't understand that: User "bar" has some folders and one shared folder from "foo" if I use the "LIST"-command, which should list AFAIK *all* folders: # telnet localhost 143 a login bar xxxx a OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES

A while back, we introduced new attributes to model functions which read and wrote from locations not otherwise visible in the IR. The motivation was to enable much more aggressive aliasing around such calls. Since that time, we've reverted the original patch and AFAIK we have no transformation or analysis passes in tree which use this information. Given this, I don't think it's

On Monday, August 7, 2023 6:05:03 AM EDT Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes > Andrew, thanks a bunch for pointing people to our org! I really appreciate it. More below... > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 11:08 +0200, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > > Hello Anantha, Michael, > > IIRC this is somewhat optimistic or a secret sausage. For

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 19/04/2018 19:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > virtio is using barriers to order memory accesses, thus > > dma_wmb/rmb is a good match. > > > > Build-tested on x86: Before > > > > [mst at tuck linux]$ size drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.o > > text data bss dec hex

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 19/04/2018 19:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > virtio is using barriers to order memory accesses, thus > > dma_wmb/rmb is a good match. > > > > Build-tested on x86: Before > > > > [mst at tuck linux]$ size drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.o > > text data bss dec hex

>> My question this time is this: is re-ordering globals at the LLVM level both possible [...] On 07/25/2016 10:53 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote: > Isn’t something a linker could/should do? AFAIK & TTBOMK, a compiler should do it [if allowed by the language] and a linker should not mess it up. I don`t know that a linker is allowed to make assumptions about code not traversing labels in

How is XRay tested? IIRC, Renato didn't see any test failures on ARM? Merging sounds reasonbaly, I'd just like to understand what's the risk for the branch. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hans, these changes reached trunk in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292516 and > https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292517 . Could you look?

AFAIK a script run through source() does not have any legit way to learn about it's own location. I need this to make sure that the script will find its datafiles after I move the whole directory. (The datafiles are in the same directory.) Here is a hack I invented to work around it: print(getwd()) source_pathname = get("ofile",envir = parent.frame()) source_dirname =

Am 23.09.2010 19:44, schrieb Chris Lattner: > In practice, copyright assignment is > really only useful (afaik) for two things: > > 1) being able to change the copyright in the future. 2) having a > single entity to down violators of the license. > > Since neither of these are really interesting goals for the project, > having distributed copyright is not a problem. Not

On 4 June 2013 22:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? > AFAIK, yes. http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html if so, are there public build bots for this? > We have one: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt Setting it up was just copy&paste on Zorg's config (and fixing the bugs