search for: af31

I can use DSMARK to mark on the Egress side. Is there a way to mark/change the DSCP value of an incoming packet on the ingress side? Thanks. Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7

I am assuming that the TOS values directly map to DSCP values in the ip header. Is this a correct assumption? If so, can someone tell me the correct setting to set call control packets with a DSCP of AF31(011010) and media with EF(101110)? So would the setting for AF be TOS=46?? Is it possible to mark the media and call control separately?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041129/beb5051...

...t38_udptl=yes) on the trunk then the call completes fine. All phones and servers are on the same LAN with no firewalls active. The trunk between AST-A and AST-B is configured like this in pjsip.conf and is identical on both machines: [transport-lan] type=transport protocol=udp bind=0.0.0.0 tos=af31 [pbxbeta] type=endpoint disallow=all allow=g722 allow=ulaw transport=transport-lan context=phone-level3 aors=pbxbeta send_rpid=no send_pai=yes trust_id_inbound=yes trust_id_outbound=yes direct_media=yes direct_media_glare_mitigation=outgoing ;direct_media_method=update tos_audio=46 tos_video=34 t3...

Hi, I am trying to run openssh 3.1p1. But it is giving "Bad packet length" error when I run sshd with default config file. On further investigation I found that the error is coming only for the cipher algorithm "aes128-cbc". Also the error comes only when I don't specify any protocol file (/usr/local/etc/ssh_host_[rd]sa_key) or specify only "protocol 2" files. I

Hi, what would be the easiest way to mark packets for AF. For example ingress www traffic being marked as AF31? thx jason _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

...ED(2)grio HTB2(af2) (1MB) GRED(1-3)grio thx jason ************************what i have now************** HTB (6Mb) | GRED (1-12) using grio af11 -> gred vq 10 af12 -> gred vq 11 af13 -> gred vq 12 af21 -> gred vq 7 af23 -> gred vq 8 af23 -> gred vq 9 af31 -> gred vq 4 af32 -> gred vq 5 af33 -> gred vq 6 af41 -> gred vq 1 af42 -> gred vq 2 af43 -> gred vq 3 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi,All I setup traffic control configuration with HTB this way: 1: root HTB qdisc | 1:1 HTB class rate 1024kbit | /-----+-----+-----+------+-----\ 1:10 1:20 1:30 1:40 1:50 1:60 EF AF41 AF31 AF21 AF11 BE and alloct different bandwidth to these PHBs(queues).So which tool would I use to generate these packets at the same to for testing?Thank you! Another question:I am studying sch_htb.c,but it's so tough for to understand,especially htb_dequeue().Would anyone please suppl...

...i noticed that there''s always an ingress and egress of which these are 2 different dev. Is it possible for before ingress and egress be the same dev?? I tried the script below but doesn''t seem to work... How to control the bandwidth in this case?? I want to show that AF11, AF21, AF31, AF41, EF, BE traffic has different throughput if 6 fullstreams of traffic is push out from server to client (with 6 different ports). eg: #! /bin/sh -x # device="eth1" client0="192.168.1.1/32" client2="192.168.1.20/32" /sbin/ipchains -A output -i $device -p tcp -s...

...prio 2 #af42 tc qdisc change dev eth0 parent 2:1 gred limit 512000 min 24000 max 32000 \ avpkt 1000 burst 40 probability 0.06 bandwidth 1024 DP 3 prio 3 #af43 tc qdisc change dev eth0 parent 2:1 gred limit 512000 min 24000 max 32000 \ avpkt 1000 burst 40 probability 0.02 bandwidth 1024 DP 4 prio 4 #af31 tc qdisc change dev eth0 parent 2:1 gred limit 512000 min 24000 max 32000 \ avpkt 1000 burst 40 probability 0.04 bandwidth 1024 DP 5 prio 5 #af32 tc qdisc change dev eth0 parent 2:1 gred limit 512000 min 24000 max 32000 \ avpkt 1000 burst 40 probability 0.06 bandwidth 1024 DP 6 prio 6 #af33 tc qdis...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1964 Bug #: 1964 Summary: QoS/DSCP names false translated to ToS hex value Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh

I''m not sure if this is a problem with the iscsitarget or zfs. I''d greatly appreciate it if it gets moved to the proper list. Well I''m just about out of ideas on what might be wrong.. Quick history: I installed OS 2008.05 when it was SNV_86 to try out ZFS with VMWare. Found out that multilun''s were being treated as multipaths so waited till SNV_94 came out to