Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "aebd".
Did you mean:
abd
2019 Mar 27
3
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...;;;DA)(A;;RPWP
> CRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;SY)(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;AO)(A;;RPLCLORC;
> ;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a54-1e2f-1
> 1d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a56-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(O
> A;;RPWP;77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b2-9455-11d1
> -aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA
> ;;RP;037088f8-0ae1-11d2-b422-00a0c968f939;;RS)(OA;;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768
> -00aa006e0529;;RS)(OA;;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(A;;RC;;;A
&...
2019 Mar 26
0
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...CCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;DA)(A;;RPWP
CRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;SY)(A;;RPWPCRCCDCLCLORCWOWDSDDTSW;;;AO)(A;;RPLCLORC;
;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a54-1e2f-1
1d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(OA;;CR;ab721a56-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b;;PS)(O
A;;RPWP;77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b2-9455-11d1
-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA;;RPWP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;PS)(OA
;;RP;037088f8-0ae1-11d2-b422-00a0c968f939;;RS)(OA;;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768
-00aa006e0529;;RS)(OA;;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(A;;RC;;;A
U)(OA;;RP;59ba2...
2019 Mar 26
2
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
Hi Tim and Rowland, thanks for Your support!
I was thinking about e.g. Python 2.7.15 compatibility (as newer Samba
versions require Python3), but You are right, here in DB can be problem
- first Samba AD DC was created by migrating Samba3 NT4 domain to Samba4
AD cca week ago (using 'samba-tool domain classicupgrade ...', according
to Samba Wiki):
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:14:02 +1300
Tim
2018 Nov 01
1
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
...1: SEC_ACE_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT
0: SEC_ACE_INHERITED_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT
type : union security_ace_object_type(case 1)
type : 77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1
inherited_type : union security_ace_object_inherited_type(case 0)
trustee : S-1-5-10
aces: struct security_ace
type : SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOW...
2018 Nov 01
2
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
I've been been trying to investigate this for sometime now, hence I came to
the experts :)
I have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
<domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New
rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade
<domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS prdc001zafsrh.<domain>.corp. -> New
2015 Dec 29
3
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
Good afternoon!
Had a samba 4 with a Windows 2003 network that is not over, I went up to
the level of my domain / forest
Forest level function: (Windows) 2008 R2
Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2
Lowest function level of the DC (Windows) 2008 R2
But it seems that Samba is not with all attributes of a Windows 2008.
Even try to join another Samba error appears
ERROR (ldb): uncaught
2015 Dec 29
0
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
...nTypes
>> attributeId: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1963
>> attributeSyntax: 2.5.5.9
>> omSyntax: 2
>> isSingleValued: TRUE
>> schemaIdGuid: 20119867-1d04-4ab7-9371-cfc3d5df0afd
>> systemOnly: FALSE
>> searchFlags: 0
>> attributeSecurityGuid: 77b5b886-944a-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1
>> systemFlags: FLAG_SCHEMA_BASE_OBJECT
>> schemaFlagsEx: FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL
>>
>> And your DC objects should have this:
>>
>> msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes: 31
>>
>> Was the original DC a Samba 4 DC ?
>>
>> Rowland
>>...
2011 May 20
1
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 83, Issue 33
...-------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:10:49 -0700
> From: Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM wiki to be removed 5/19
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Message-ID: <4D7A407D-AEBD-4CA7-BE2F-762DB366DD08 at apple.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>
> The time has come. The wiki will be removed.
>
> Thanks,
> Tanya
>
> On May 10, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>
> > Just a reminder. You have a little over a week to mo...
2002 Mar 24
1
1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise
...7VYy4XTjTNP18F1dDox0YbN4zISy1Kv88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...