Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ae0d6b9c".
2011 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On 12/16/11 4:45 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2011, at 2:41 PM, John Criswell wrote:
>
>> On 12/16/11 4:14 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Do we consider the above transformation legal?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, the transformation is perfectly
2011 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Dec 16, 2011, at 2:41 PM, John Criswell wrote:
> On 12/16/11 4:14 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>>> > Do we consider the above transformation legal?
>>
>> Yes, the transformation is perfectly legal for the normal compiler.
>
> So how do you guarantee that the behavior is predictable
2011 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
...ed to suffer before the cure was deemed worse than the disease?
>
> -- John T.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111216/ae0d6b9c/attachment.html>