search for: adwantag

Am Freitag, den 27.08.2010, 20:51 +0300 schrieb Sampo Syreeni: > On 2010-08-27, Ralph Giles wrote: > > >> My question to you, What advantages has ogg vs matroska. > > > > They're both free containers, and there isn't a significant > > performance difference, so either one works from a free media > > perspective. [...] > > Personally I would

Sampo Syreeni <decoy at iki.fi> wrote: ... > [I]n > well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see > some array of differing protocols, you will also see an easy way of > discerning those protocols from each other. Before engaging in any sort > of decoding endeavor. > > File names, resource fork types or IFF/RIFF block types do not seem to > be

Am Samstag, den 28.08.2010, 01:01 +0300 schrieb Sampo Syreeni: > On 2010-08-27, Alexey Fisher wrote: > > > Doing one thing seem to be good reason. User normally see just file > > name say bla.ogg or bla.mkv . [...] > > Yes, that might be a benefit as well. But an unexpected one: in > well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see > some

On 08/29/2010 06:16 PM, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Are there any options to recover > video with missing header? Or tip for archiving, for example make some > recorevable stream with backup header? If the whole first portion of the file is missing, then regenerating the header is, in the abstract, a hard problem involving searching a very large solution space. In practice, many encoders

Hallo all, euphoria with cheese, the project i working on, i needed to make decision about codecs and containers we use. I'm clearly not expert in this. After the euphoria about vp8/webm going slowly to the end, i see advantages what theora has against vp8. Seems like theora perform better on LoEnd hardware. Even x264 with good optimisation work not really good on slow Athom. My question to

On 2010-08-27, Ralph Giles wrote: >> My question to you, What advantages has ogg vs matroska. > > They're both free containers, and there isn't a significant > performance difference, so either one works from a free media > perspective. [...] Personally I would add the following points/bullets: * Ogg has a lesser semantic burden, so that e.g. embedded

On 2010-08-27, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Doing one thing seem to be good reason. User normally see just file > name say bla.ogg or bla.mkv . [...] Yes, that might be a benefit as well. But an unexpected one: in well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see some array of differing protocols, you will also see an easy way of discerning those protocols from each