search for: advisably

Hi Folks, I am wanting advise on a good soft-phone on Linux. I have looked at Gnophone but cannot seem to get it to compile under debian sarge. I am now looing at sipXphone seem to be picking up that it is not that stable, but perhaps someone here can advise on what softphone I can use on Linux. Thanks in advance, Hamish ------------------------------------------------------------------- |

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at

Helo, We use a big fileserver running Linux/Samba as fileshare. We are facing performances problems for which we'd like some advise : Clients are OS2(LanManager) and windows 2000 reading and writing lots of files in the same directory on the fileshare. We currently have more than 80 000 files in the directory (files size is about 100 Bytes). Could you please advise us some Samba tuning

Hi all, Am looking for everyones advise/recommendations. I have am setting up a network of both office and home based workers. The office workers will be on the same network as the Asterisk box so no NAT hassles there. However, the home workers are on their own DSL connections so I imagine that most will be behind NAT. I had hoped to use Sipura SPA-2000's but I presume I would need either

Dear Experts, Could someone recommend good Linux software RAID primer. It would be good if it has good coverage of monitoring and dealing with failures. I inherited a couple of boxes with big bunch of software RAIDs each, and I even may have some problems, but I don't want to bother anybody with specifics unless I really hit brick wall, not just my own ignorance. Thanks in advance for all

Hi I have a data table matrix,"data" which looks like below:- V1 V2 V3 1 -6382.719 -1096.554 6998994 2 -some values- 3 -some values- 4 -some values- 5 -some values- Querying dim of "data" gives me 3 columns and 5 rows. And currently I want to plot "V1" against "V2" with the condition that I want to mark(color) the point(row 5) on the

(another in an ongoing list of things i just want to clarify for the sake of future courses taught on centos.) from this RHEL doc page: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-openssh-server-config.html the reader is advised to, for the sake of security, remove/disable vsftpd, ostensibly in favour of sftp/sftp-server. really? i can obviously

Hi, You might want to first read http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf which explains most of the basic stuff. Most of the questions you'll have will be answered on http://www.voip-info.org or by reading http://www.asteriskdocs.org/modules/tinycontent/content/docbook/current_ v1/docs-html/book1.html Oh, and most questions have also been answered on this mailing list so look at

When using "smbmount" (but not mount.cifs), I get the warning message: Server's Role (logon server) NOT ADVISED with domain-level security This has appeared after I added "security=domain" back into my smb.conf file (seems I or an upgrade deleted it last December). Why is it "not advised" to use the same machine for logon server and domain security? Is it just

Hello, I would like to deploy centos on hundreds of client PC (a new setup). Presently, several distros has attract me due to their focus on the desktop, however they only have few months lifetime before a new version released. Is it advisable using centos on client? what about support for new hardware and several office productivity software like openoffice, did centos always update to the

TechTV News advises consumers of Open Vorbis being better then mp3's in both quality and at a reduced file size. (Tue Jul 23 00:09:18 EDT 2002) -- Roger ----- Verify my pgp/gnupg signature on my HomePage: http://www.alltel.net/~rogerx/about/index.html http://www.alltel.net/~rogerx/about/index.html <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

I have upgraded from 1.2.6 to 2.0.1 and successfully passed all my test and manual testing. Everything seems to be working correctly. My application is pretty vanilla and so there where few complications. Question is, should I do another point upgrade (and if so, which point to upgrade to next) or is it safe (and prudent) to just go straight on to the current version (2.3.x). Advise would be

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:04:13PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it > exists, read the advised MTU and use it. > > No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the > negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a > warning is emitted if the guest changes

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:04:13PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it > exists, read the advised MTU and use it. > > No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the > negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a > warning is emitted if the guest changes

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VIRTIO spec addition found at

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VIRTIO spec addition found at

Hi I need an advise if any one can help me. i have mass of data in 2 array A and B: A = 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 B = 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 and i have 3 rules to merge them into 3rd array C: if A[i] + B[i] == 0 then C[i]=0 if A[i] + B[i] == 1 then C[i]=1 if A[i] + B[i] == 2 then C[i]=2 it looks easy but with the regular way (loop) with large data it takes days (i test it). If any one can advise me what to do