search for: advance_routing_for_multi_homed

Hello all Here is the scenario: We have a mail server VM which currently has two virtual NICs attached to it. One NIC is has an IP on a subnet with a default gateway defined and the other NIC has an IP on a different subnet with a different gateway on a different VLAN defined. Now when I activate both NICs, and run an ifconfig -a, I see that both IP addresses are showing. Now here is the

Hi There is a Centos 7 up-to-date box with 2 interfaces, let's say 192.168.1.12 - enp2s0, 192.168.1.13 on enp3s0. Default gateway on enp2s0. The gateway is pfsense, IP is 192.168.1.1 with 2 WAN connections On the gateway the outgoing traffic is routed by source ip to different WAN, 192.168.1.12 to WAN1 and 192.168.1.13 to WAN2 On the centos box are set all the route and routing rules:

On 08/08/2016 04:05 AM, Levente Birta wrote: > Can I add this in any config files (ex: route-enp2s0)? Yes. Add a route file for each interface, and set up rules to send packets out the corresponding physical interface: https://blogs.oracle.com/networking/entry/advance_routing_for_multi_homed

...te: > How do I > configure the networking so that both IPs are pingable and the VM is > reachable via both IPs? You need one rule file per interface, which directs traffic out the appropriate interface based on the source address of the packet: https://blogs.oracle.com/networking/entry/advance_routing_for_multi_homed

...n 08/08/2016 04:05 AM, Levente Birta wrote: >> Can I add this in any config files (ex: route-enp2s0)? > > > Yes. Add a route file for each interface, and set up rules to send > packets out the corresponding physical interface: > > https://blogs.oracle.com/networking/entry/advance_routing_for_multi_homed > Yes, but no :) I do all this and working on LAN ... all traffic go in/out on the proper interface ... the problem is when I try to access the internet on the second interface .... If I add "#route add default gw 192.168.1.1 dev enp3s0" all is good, but cannot add that in route-...

I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I

Hello, i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices. I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the incoming device Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables? Greeting J

...tworking so that both IPs are pingable and the VM is >> reachable via both IPs? >> > > > You need one rule file per interface, which directs traffic out the > appropriate interface based on the source address of the packet: > > https://blogs.oracle.com/networking/entry/advance_routing_for_multi_homed > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

Hi folks, I have a server at Soyoustart.com (which is a brand of OVH). I run CentOS 6.7 and have problems with network configuration. I want to add a second public ip (failover ip) to the server and did follow the instructions in the CentOS-section of http://hilfe.ovh.de/AdministrationIpAliasHinzufuegen After executing the required steps I'm not able to reach the host via the second ip