search for: adss

...removed by >>>> myself and >>>> they weren't present before I manually perform mentioned clean up. >>> >>> Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything about >>> these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the ADSS >>> console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. >>> >>> Best, >>> Ole >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> mathias >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-10-29 12:38...

...t;>> they weren't present before I manually perform mentioned clean up. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything >>>>> about these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the >>>>> ADSS console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Ole >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> mathias >>&...

...ent before I manually perform mentioned clean up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything >>>>>>> about these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the >>>>>>> ADSS console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Ole >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>&gt...

...d during demote process as I didn't removed by myself >> and >> they weren't present before I manually perform mentioned clean up. > > Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything about > these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the ADSS > console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. > > Best, > Ole > > >> >> Cheers, >> >> mathias >> >> >> 2015-10-29 12:38 GMT+01:00 Ole Traupe <ole.traupe at tu-berlin.de>: >> >>> Hi mathias, >>>...

...f and >>>>> they weren't present before I manually perform mentioned clean up. >>>> >>>> Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything >>>> about these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the >>>> ADSS console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Ole >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> mathias >>>>> >>>>> &gt...

...weren't present before I manually perform mentioned clean up. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything >>>>>> about these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the >>>>>> ADSS console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Ole >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>&g...

...;>>>>>>> up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything >>>>>>>> about these entries or commands. There was only one entry in >>>>>>>> the ADSS console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of >>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Ole >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>&gt...

Hai Marco, > It is still true that 'samba-tool sites' is 'not recommended' and it i > better to manage sites and subnets with ADSS? Or that page have to/can > be updated? When i look at the page modify date, i say use the RSAT tools. I dont (hardly) use samba-tool here.. I do everything through RSAT tools. > Only a little note: You can target the ip range in the GPO also, this should help you in what you want. Greetz...

...ess as I didn't removed by >>> myself and >>> they weren't present before I manually perform mentioned clean up. >> >> Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything about >> these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the ADSS >> console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. >> >> Best, >> Ole >> >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> mathias >>> >>> >>> 2015-10-29 12:38 GMT+01:00 Ole Traupe <ole.traupe at tu-berlin.de...

Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of replication > topology? I think you have to define a topology of the domain, using ADSS: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/canitpro/2015/03/03/step-by-step-setting-up-active-directory-sites-subnets-site-links/ defining links and weight. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/...

I believe that I've found a bug on Samba 2.2.3a. Sure, there is the 2.2.5 version out there, but reading the changelog I couldn't find something that looked like what I've found. Problem is: Some files (very few of them, about 0,5%) are created, with 2 another copies. The file witch would be the real one is perfect. And we got "for free" 2 corrupted copies of it, with

...py the contents of the "Visual Basic" box to a text file and rename it > to "something.vbs". Run the vb script as admin e.g. on a Win 7 64 bit > (worked for me) domain member client being logged on as "Administrator". > This removed my former PDC from ADUC and ADSS. > > Best, > Ole > > > > Am 29.10.2015 um 12:16 schrieb mathias dufresne: > >> Hi, >> >> I played with demote recently on a test AD domain composed with Samba >> version 4.3.0 and 4.3.1. I demoted all version 4.3.0. >> >> I was facing same...

...ix/private/dovecot-lmtp { group = postfix mode = 0600 user = postfix } } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 ssl = yes } } ssl = required ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/private/imap.toppoint.de.crt ssl_cipher_list = HIGH::!aNULL:!eNULL:!kRSA:!kPSK:!kSRP:!aDSS:!kECDH:!kDH:!MD5:!SHA1:!RC2:!RC4:!SEED:!IDEA:!DES:!3DES ssl_dh_parameters_length = 2048 ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/imap.toppoint.de.pem ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = yes ssl_protocols = !SSLv3 !SSLv2 userdb { driver = passwd } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins = sieve } protocol imap { ssl_cert...

In Samba/NT i was used to share mapping done in netlogon script, so users move around between sites, get home and profile from remote location but still have share mapped from local servers. In Samba/AD, using GPO, share mapping is in ''user policy'', and so user roam between sites and get different policies? I'm googling around but i'm a bit confused... i can still use

...I can see references to the first DC that remain. Unfortunately, that DC no longer exists so I simply cannot demote it again. Following the instructions on the "Demote a Samba AD DC" page "Verifying The Demotion" section, I can see references to the original AD DC in the ADUC, ADSS and the MMC Console. So, I need to fix this. Currently I am running a Samba 4.3.11 version AD DC. I see that it is suggested that I use v4.4.0 or newer to "Demote an Offline Domain Controller." I have a second v4.5.0 AD DC waiting to join the existing v4.3.11 AD DC. The idea is to joi...

...hanged to protect the innocent): /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain join essence.internal.com DC -UAdministrator --realm=example.com --server=remotedc.example.com --site=local I am trying to do this due to the bug that doesn't allow the manual moving of DC's to new Sites by using the ADSS drag and drop method. Thanks, Chris. -- ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd) Chris Alavoine mob +44 (0)7724 710 730 www.alavoinecs.co.uk http://twitter.com/#!/alavoinecs http://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-alavoine/39/606/192

hi, On 10/1/20 12:21 AM, JEAN-PAUL CHAPALAIN wrote: > I had the same problem when migrating from Dovecot V2.2.36 on, Centos-7 to?Dovecot v2.3.8 on Centos-8 My report is specifically/solely about the addition/use of the Options = ServerPreference parameter. I don't see that in your configuration. Are you using it? In a config using Dovecot's submission proxy?

...ia samba a écrit : >> Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba >>    In chel di` si favelave... >> >>> Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of >>> replication >>> topology? >> I think you have to define a topology of the domain, using ADSS: >> >>     https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/canitpro/2015/03/03/step-by-step-setting-up-active-directory-sites-subnets-site-links/ >> >> >> defining links and weight. >> > Right, I allready had this kind of setup. > I created 3 remote sites and subnets...

...line 866, in send_DsReplicaUpdateRefs ctx.drsuapi.DsReplicaUpdateRefs(ctx.drsuapi_handle, 1, r) Which seem to suggest that the join fails, it tries to clean up and gets a NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error. This leaves me with a non-functioning DC appearing in the Domain Controller list on ADUC and ADSS which need to be cleaned out. Any advice on how I can get around this problem? Thanks Chris. -- ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd) Chris Alavoine mob +44 (0)7724 710 730 www.alavoinecs.co.uk http://twitter.com/#!/alavoinecs http://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-alavoine/39/606/192

...should > have been removed during demote process as I didn't removed by myself and > they weren't present before I manually perform mentioned clean up. Thank you for the further details. I can't really say anything about these entries or commands. There was only one entry in the ADSS console for my former PDC, and the script got rid of that. Best, Ole > > Cheers, > > mathias > > > 2015-10-29 12:38 GMT+01:00 Ole Traupe <ole.traupe at tu-berlin.de>: > >> Hi mathias, >> >> thanks for the heads-up! However, my AD Sites and Service...